NTR vs. SHW: Nutrien vs. Sherwin-Williams Stock Comparison
How do Nutrien (NTR) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Nutrien (NTR) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) both belong to the Chemicals industry, though NTR is classified under Fertilizers & Agricultural Chemicals while SHW falls under Specialty Chemicals.
| Profile Item | NTR | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Nutrien Ltd. | The Sherwin-Williams Company |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Chemicals | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Fertilizers & Agricultural Chemicals | Specialty Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 33.89 billion USD | 83.13 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 2, 2018 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | NTR | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 30.80% | 5.74% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 13.84% | 13.18% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 4.29% | 2.84% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | NTR | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 32.77% | 29.59% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.64 | 1.02 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -58.17% | -42.46% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.56M | 1.72M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | NTR | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.81 | 0.05 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.18 | 0.08 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 63.70% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Nutrien (NTR) at 8.76%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
NTR
Materials industry group
8.76%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- NTR
- 8.76%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
SHW
Materials industry group
63.70%
- SHW
- 63.70%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Nutrien (NTR) at 8.04% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 10.74% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
NTR
Materials industry group
8.04%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- NTR
- 8.04%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
SHW
Materials industry group
10.74%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- SHW
- 10.74%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Nutrien (NTR) at 10.97% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 17.56% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
NTR
Materials industry group
10.97%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- NTR
- 10.97%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
SHW
Materials industry group
17.56%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- SHW
- 17.56%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | NTR | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 8.76% | 63.70% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.24% | 9.48% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.04% | 10.74% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 10.97% | 17.56% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 31.60% | 48.60% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Nutrien (NTR) at 3.52% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 2.06% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Nutrien (NTR) at 242.65% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at -2.75% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for NTR.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | NTR | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 3.52% | 2.06% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -10.80% | 2.10% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 242.65% | -2.75% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -30.99% | 9.95% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Nutrien (NTR) at 1.41 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.71 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
NTR
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- NTR
- 1.41
- Min
- 0.16
SHW
Materials industry group
0.71
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- SHW
- 0.71
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Nutrien (NTR) at 0.55 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.72 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
NTR
Materials industry group
0.55
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- NTR
- 0.55
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.72
- SHW
- 3.72
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | NTR | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.41 | 0.71 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.55 | 3.72 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.38 | 3.04 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Nutrien (NTR) at 3.03% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.91% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, NTR the richer one.
NTR
Materials industry group
3.03%
- Max
- 4.52%
- NTR
- 3.03%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
0.91%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- SHW
- 0.91%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 29.35% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Nutrien (NTR) at 47.93% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
NTR
Materials industry group
47.93%
- Max
- 83.62%
- NTR
- 47.93%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
29.35%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- SHW
- 29.35%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | NTR | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.03% | 0.91% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 47.93% | 29.35% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Nutrien (NTR) at 15.61 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 31.66 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
NTR
Materials industry group
15.61
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- NTR
- 15.61
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
SHW
Materials industry group
31.66
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- SHW
- 31.66
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Nutrien (NTR) at 1.24 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.34 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
NTR
Materials industry group
1.24
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- NTR
- 1.24
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.34
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- SHW
- 3.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Nutrien (NTR) at 1.32 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 20.78 prices above its benchmark range — SHW looks rich relative to book.
NTR
Materials industry group
1.32
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- NTR
- 1.32
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
SHW
Materials industry group
20.78
- SHW
- 20.78
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | NTR | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 15.61 | 31.66 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.24 | 3.34 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.32 | 20.78 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 5.77% | 2.98% |