LIN vs. NTR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 3, 2025

Here’s a clear look at LIN and NTR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	LIN	NTR
Company Name	Linde plc	Nutrien Ltd.
Country	United Kingdom	Canada
GICS Sector	Materials	Materials
GICS Industry	Chemicals	Chemicals
Market Capitalization	222.46 billion USD	28.57 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NYSE
Listing Date	June 17, 1992	January 2, 2018
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LIN and NTR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LIN vs. NTR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	LIN	NTR
5-Day Price Return	0.18%	-0.44%
13-Week Price Return	1.24%	2.60%
26-Week Price Return	2.94%	13.32%
52-Week Price Return	-0.94%	25.76%
Month-to-Date Return	-0.69%	3.26%
Year-to-Date Return	13.45%	27.07%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.87M	2.34M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.75M	1.44M
3-Month Volatility	12.74%	22.54%
Beta	0.93	0.73

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LIN

17.46%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 29.52%
Q3: 13.18%
Median: 6.53%
Q1: 1.35%
Min: -11.86%

In the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, LIN’s Return on Equity of 17.46% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

NTR

5.54%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 29.52%
Q3: 13.18%
Median: 6.53%
Q1: 1.35%
Min: -11.86%

NTR’s Return on Equity of 5.54% is on par with the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LIN vs. NTR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LIN

20.20%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 20.20%
Q3: 9.15%
Median: 3.94%
Q1: 0.60%
Min: -10.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.20% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NTR

5.25%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 20.20%
Q3: 9.15%
Median: 3.94%
Q1: 0.60%
Min: -10.43%

NTR’s Net Profit Margin of 5.25% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Chemicals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LIN vs. NTR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LIN

26.75%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 27.33%
Q3: 13.82%
Median: 7.98%
Q1: 3.60%
Min: -7.61%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.75% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

NTR

10.02%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 27.33%
Q3: 13.82%
Median: 7.98%
Q1: 3.60%
Min: -7.61%

NTR’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.02% is around the midpoint for the Chemicals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LIN vs. NTR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	LIN	NTR
Return on Equity (TTM)	17.46%	5.54%
Return on Assets (TTM)	8.10%	2.60%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	20.20%	5.25%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	26.75%	10.02%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	48.45%	29.18%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LIN

0.93

Chemicals Industry

Max: 3.72
Q3: 2.38
Median: 1.69
Q1: 1.42
Min: 0.75

LIN’s Current Ratio of 0.93 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

NTR

1.33

Chemicals Industry

Max: 3.72
Q3: 2.38
Median: 1.69
Q1: 1.42
Min: 0.75

NTR’s Current Ratio of 1.33 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LIN vs. NTR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LIN

0.67

Chemicals Industry

Max: 1.53
Q3: 1.00
Median: 0.69
Q1: 0.41
Min: 0.00

LIN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NTR

0.54

Chemicals Industry

Max: 1.53
Q3: 1.00
Median: 0.69
Q1: 0.41
Min: 0.00

NTR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LIN vs. NTR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LIN

33.09

Chemicals Industry

Max: 56.43
Q3: 26.33
Median: 8.84
Q1: 2.54
Min: -9.39

LIN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 33.09 is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

NTR

2.27

Chemicals Industry

Max: 56.43
Q3: 26.33
Median: 8.84
Q1: 2.54
Min: -9.39

In the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, NTR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.27 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

LIN vs. NTR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	LIN	NTR
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.93	1.33
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.70	0.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.67	0.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	33.09	2.27

Growth

Revenue Growth

LIN vs. NTR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LIN vs. NTR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LIN

1.25%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 6.59%
Q3: 3.67%
Median: 2.44%
Q1: 1.36%
Min: 0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Yield of 1.25% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

NTR

3.73%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 6.59%
Q3: 3.67%
Median: 2.44%
Q1: 1.36%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.73%, NTR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Chemicals industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LIN vs. NTR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LIN

40.71%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 192.00%
Q3: 108.95%
Median: 57.38%
Q1: 27.28%
Min: 0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.71% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NTR

78.21%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 192.00%
Q3: 108.95%
Median: 57.38%
Q1: 27.28%
Min: 0.00%

NTR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 78.21% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LIN vs. NTR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	LIN	NTR
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.25%	3.73%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	40.71%	78.21%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LIN

32.60

Chemicals Industry

Max: 49.43
Q3: 32.03
Median: 21.32
Q1: 14.93
Min: 8.66

A P/E Ratio of 32.60 places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

NTR

20.97

Chemicals Industry

Max: 49.43
Q3: 32.03
Median: 21.32
Q1: 14.93
Min: 8.66

NTR’s P/E Ratio of 20.97 is within the middle range for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LIN vs. NTR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LIN

6.58

Chemicals Industry

Max: 3.90
Q3: 2.23
Median: 1.00
Q1: 0.55
Min: 0.15

With a P/S Ratio of 6.58, LIN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Chemicals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

NTR

1.10

Chemicals Industry

Max: 3.90
Q3: 2.23
Median: 1.00
Q1: 0.55
Min: 0.15

NTR’s P/S Ratio of 1.10 aligns with the market consensus for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LIN vs. NTR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LIN

5.73

Chemicals Industry

Max: 5.01
Q3: 2.59
Median: 1.50
Q1: 0.95
Min: 0.30

At 5.73, LIN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Chemicals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NTR

1.10

Chemicals Industry

Max: 5.01
Q3: 2.59
Median: 1.50
Q1: 0.95
Min: 0.30

NTR’s P/B Ratio of 1.10 is within the conventional range for the Chemicals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LIN vs. NTR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	LIN	NTR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	32.60	20.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	6.58	1.10
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	5.73	1.10
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	43.18	6.31