Seek Returns logo

NTES vs. TTWO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NTES and TTWO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

NTES trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, TTWO is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolNTESTTWO
Company NameNetEase, Inc.Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
CountryChinaUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesCommunication Services
GICS IndustryEntertainmentEntertainment
Market Capitalization83.01 billion USD42.18 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 30, 2000April 15, 1997
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NTES and TTWO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NTES vs. TTWO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNTESTTWO
5-Day Price Return0.66%-1.93%
13-Week Price Return9.59%-2.55%
26-Week Price Return24.53%8.84%
52-Week Price Return41.03%51.94%
Month-to-Date Return0.17%2.67%
Year-to-Date Return46.31%24.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.03M2.28M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.02M2.17M
3-Month Volatility24.86%23.84%
Beta0.661.01

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NTES

24.25%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

In the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s Return on Equity of 24.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TTWO

-98.81%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

TTWO has a negative Return on Equity of -98.81%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

NTES vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NTES

31.19%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.19% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TTWO

-72.92%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

TTWO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -72.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

NTES vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NTES

31.43%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.43% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TTWO

-72.16%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

TTWO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -72.16%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

NTES vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNTESTTWO
Return on Equity (TTM)24.25%-98.81%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.31%-37.91%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)31.19%-72.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.43%-72.16%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)63.17%56.66%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NTES

3.23

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

NTES’s Current Ratio of 3.23 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TTWO

1.16

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

TTWO’s Current Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NTES vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NTES

0.08

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

NTES’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TTWO

0.88

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

TTWO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Entertainment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

NTES vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NTES

161.13

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 161.13, NTES demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

TTWO

-44.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

TTWO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -44.74. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

NTES vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNTESTTWO
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.231.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)3.101.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.080.88
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)161.13-44.74

Growth

Revenue Growth

NTES vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NTES vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NTES

2.18%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.18%, NTES offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Entertainment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NTES vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NTES

36.90%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTES’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.90% is within the typical range for the Entertainment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NTES vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNTESTTWO
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.18%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)36.90%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NTES

16.94

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s P/E Ratio of 16.94 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TTWO

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

P/E Ratio data for TTWO is currently unavailable.

NTES vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NTES

5.28

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

NTES’s P/S Ratio of 5.28 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TTWO

7.26

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

TTWO’s P/S Ratio of 7.26 is in the upper echelon for the Entertainment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

NTES vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NTES

4.09

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

NTES’s P/B Ratio of 4.09 is within the conventional range for the Entertainment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TTWO

12.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

TTWO’s P/B Ratio of 12.74 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

NTES vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Entertainment industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNTESTTWO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.94--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.287.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.0912.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)13.09187.28