NTES vs. SKYD: NetEase vs. Skydance Stock Comparison

Company Profile

NetEase (NTES) and Skydance (SKYD) both fall under the Media & Entertainment industry group, but NTES is classified in Entertainment while SKYD is classified in Media.

Skydance (SKYD) trades as ordinary local shares, while NetEase (NTES) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Skydance (SKYD) has an aggressive beta of 1.60, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while NetEase (NTES) is defensive at 0.61 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Skydance (SKYD) is heavily traded at around 22.91M shares per day, whereas NetEase (NTES) sees a more moderate 738.35K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Skydance (SKYD) reports a negative ROE of -0.90%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile NetEase (NTES) reports 20.37%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Skydance (SKYD) reports a negative net margin of -2.13%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile NetEase (NTES) reports 27.88%, ranking against industry peers normally.

NetEase (NTES) at 40.16% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Skydance (SKYD) at 9.35%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both NetEase (NTES) at 6.96% and Skydance (SKYD) at -1.48% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Only one side can be read here: NetEase (NTES) reports EPS growth of 14.04%, ranked against its industry; Skydance (SKYD) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Skydance (SKYD) at 1.04 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while NetEase (NTES) at 3.45 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

NetEase (NTES) at 0.07 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Skydance (SKYD) at 1.26 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both NetEase (NTES) at 3.17% and Skydance (SKYD) at 2.45% yield above their industries’ entire benchmark ranges — high enough that dividend safety, not income, becomes the first question.

Both pay out more than their industries’ typical bands, and SKYD more so: NetEase (NTES) at 41.85% sits above the band, while Skydance (SKYD) at 93.20% exceeds every peer in its group.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: NetEase (NTES) trades at 17.98 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Skydance (SKYD) has no P/E ratio this period.

On P/S ratio, both NetEase (NTES) at 0.71 and Skydance (SKYD) at 1.39 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

Skydance (SKYD) at 0.76 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile relative to book while NetEase (NTES) at 16.57 prices above its industry range — a wide valuation gap against assets.

Valuation Metrics