Seek Returns

NMR vs. UBS: Nomura vs. UBS Stock Comparison

How do Nomura (NMR) and UBS (UBS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Nomura (NMR) and UBS (UBS) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though NMR is classified under Investment Banking & Brokerage while UBS falls under Diversified Capital Markets.

UBS (UBS) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Nomura (NMR) and UBS (UBS)
Profile ItemNMRUBS
NameNomura Holdings, Inc. Sponsored ADRUBS Group AG
Country/RegionJapanSwitzerland
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS Industry GroupFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsCapital Markets
GICS Sub-IndustryInvestment Banking & BrokerageDiversified Capital Markets
Market Capitalization27.53 billion USD144.79 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 17, 2001May 16, 2000
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

NMR
UBS
GSPC
Loading price history…
Nomura (NMR) vs. UBS (UBS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Nomura (NMR) and UBS (UBS). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Nomura (NMR) and UBS (UBS). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Nomura (NMR) and UBS (UBS)
MetricNMRUBS
Total Return (1Y)35.42%30.78%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)37.86%29.39%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)18.78%25.00%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

NMR
UBS
GSPC
Loading price history…
Nomura (NMR) vs. UBS (UBS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Nomura (NMR) and UBS (UBS). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Nomura (NMR) and UBS (UBS)
MetricNMRUBS
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)29.52%27.78%
Beta (5Y)0.791.15
Max Drawdown (5Y)-38.40%-32.48%
Avg. Volume (3M)789.26K1.93M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
NMR and UBS are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Nomura (NMR) and UBS (UBS)
MetricNMRUBS
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.060.95
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.551.44

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Nomura (NMR) earns 11.51% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; UBS (UBS) has no ROE this period.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

11.51%

Max
44.78%
Q3
21.85%
Median
12.91%
NMR
11.51%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-18.71%

UBS

Financial Services industry group

--

Max
44.78%
Q3
21.85%
Median
12.91%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-18.71%
UBS
--
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. UBS (UBS): UBS does not report ROE, so it has no value marker; NMR is benchmarked against the Financial Services industry group.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Nomura (NMR) at 17.12% and UBS (UBS) at 18.18% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

17.12%

Max
62.84%
Q3
28.05%
NMR
17.12%
Median
15.36%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-28.52%

UBS

Financial Services industry group

18.18%

Max
62.84%
Q3
28.05%
UBS
18.18%
Median
15.36%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-28.52%
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. UBS (UBS): A comparison of their net margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Nomura (NMR) at 24.36% and UBS (UBS) at 27.10% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

24.36%

Max
107.33%
Q3
55.90%
Median
30.09%
NMR
24.36%
Q1
14.60%
Min
-44.34%

UBS

Financial Services industry group

27.10%

Max
107.33%
Q3
55.90%
Median
30.09%
UBS
27.10%
Q1
14.60%
Min
-44.34%
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. UBS (UBS): A comparison of their operating margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Nomura (NMR) and UBS (UBS)
MetricNMRUBS
ROE (TTM)11.51%--
ROA (TTM)0.68%--
Net Margin (TTM)17.12%18.18%
Operating Margin (TTM)24.36%27.10%
Gross Margin (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% and UBS (UBS) at 4.30% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. UBS (UBS): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

UBS (UBS) at 55.26% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for UBS.

Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. UBS (UBS): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Nomura (NMR) and UBS (UBS)
MetricNMRUBS
Revenue Growth (YoY)10.80%4.30%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)17.17%12.44%
EPS Growth (YoY)7.17%55.26%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)58.75%1.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services and UBS (UBS) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services and UBS (UBS) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Nomura (NMR) and UBS (UBS)
MetricNMRUBS
Current Ratio (MRQ)----
Debt / Equity (MRQ)----
Net Debt / EBITDA----

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

UBS (UBS) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Nomura (NMR) reports a yield of 620.40%, ranking against industry peers normally.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

620.40%

NMR
620.40%
Max
9.77%
Q3
3.92%
Median
1.09%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UBS

Financial Services industry group

0.00%

Max
9.77%
Q3
3.92%
Median
1.09%
UBS
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. UBS (UBS): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Nomura (NMR) at 16.85% and UBS (UBS) at 36.30% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

16.85%

Max
241.07%
Q3
97.36%
Median
25.77%
NMR
16.85%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UBS

Financial Services industry group

36.30%

Max
241.07%
Q3
97.36%
UBS
36.30%
Median
25.77%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. UBS (UBS): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Nomura (NMR) and UBS (UBS)
MetricNMRUBS
Dividend Yield (TTM)620.40%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)16.85%36.30%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 and UBS (UBS) at 15.77 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

10.83

Max
45.85
Q3
24.64
Median
15.37
NMR
10.83
Q1
9.68
Min
0.16

UBS

Financial Services industry group

15.77

Max
45.85
Q3
24.64
UBS
15.77
Median
15.37
Q1
9.68
Min
0.16
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. UBS (UBS): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while UBS (UBS) at 2.71 prices around its industry’s middle — NMR costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

0.01

Max
9.23
Q3
4.57
Median
2.72
Q1
1.28
NMR
0.01
Min
-0.55

UBS

Financial Services industry group

2.71

Max
9.23
Q3
4.57
Median
2.72
UBS
2.71
Q1
1.28
Min
-0.55
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. UBS (UBS): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 and UBS (UBS) at 1.64 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

1.15

Max
7.79
Q3
3.63
Median
1.57
NMR
1.15
Q1
0.81
Min
-0.39

UBS

Financial Services industry group

1.64

Max
7.79
Q3
3.63
UBS
1.64
Median
1.57
Q1
0.81
Min
-0.39
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. UBS (UBS): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Nomura (NMR) and UBS (UBS)
MetricNMRUBS
P/E Ratio (TTM)10.8315.77
P/S Ratio (TTM)0.012.71
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.151.64
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)----