NMR vs. V: Nomura vs. Visa Stock Comparison
How do Nomura (NMR) and Visa (V) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Nomura (NMR) and Visa (V) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but NMR is classified in Capital Markets while V is classified in Financial Services.
Visa (V) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | NMR | V |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Nomura Holdings, Inc. Sponsored ADR | Visa Inc. Class A |
| Country/Region | Japan | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Capital Markets | Financial Services |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Investment Banking & Brokerage | Transaction & Payment Processing Services |
| Market Capitalization | 27.53 billion USD | 788.58 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | December 17, 2001 | March 19, 2008 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | NMR | V |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 35.42% | 27.50% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 37.86% | 21.55% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.78% | 15.65% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | NMR | V |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 29.52% | 22.99% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.79 | 0.78 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -38.40% | -24.14% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 789.26K | 6.56M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | NMR | V |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.06 | 1.01 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.55 | 1.64 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Visa (V) at 63.51% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Nomura (NMR) at 11.51%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
11.51%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- NMR
- 11.51%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
V
Financial Services industry group
63.51%
- V
- 63.51%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
Visa (V) at 51.20% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Nomura (NMR) at 17.12%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
17.12%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- NMR
- 17.12%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
V
Financial Services industry group
51.20%
- Max
- 62.84%
- V
- 51.20%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Visa (V) at 63.73% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Nomura (NMR) at 24.36%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
24.36%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- NMR
- 24.36%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
V
Financial Services industry group
63.73%
- Max
- 107.33%
- V
- 63.73%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | NMR | V |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 11.51% | 63.51% |
| ROA (TTM) | 0.68% | 19.61% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 17.12% | 51.20% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 24.36% | 63.73% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% and Visa (V) at 14.76% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% and Visa (V) at 20.78% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | NMR | V |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 10.80% | 14.76% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 17.17% | 12.02% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 7.17% | 20.78% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 58.75% | 14.16% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services and Visa (V) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services and Visa (V) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | NMR | V |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Visa (V) at 0.66% pays an industry-typical yield; Nomura (NMR) at 620.40% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
620.40%
- NMR
- 620.40%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
V
Financial Services industry group
0.66%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- V
- 0.66%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Nomura (NMR) at 16.85% and Visa (V) at 21.75% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
16.85%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- NMR
- 16.85%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
V
Financial Services industry group
21.75%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- V
- 21.75%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | NMR | V |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 620.40% | 0.66% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 16.85% | 21.75% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Visa (V) at 34.31 sits in the richer quartile — V needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
10.83
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- NMR
- 10.83
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
V
Financial Services industry group
34.31
- Max
- 45.85
- V
- 34.31
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Visa (V) at 17.18 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
0.01
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- NMR
- 0.01
- Min
- -0.55
V
Financial Services industry group
17.18
- V
- 17.18
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Visa (V) at 22.05 prices above its benchmark range — V looks rich relative to book.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
1.15
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 1.57
- NMR
- 1.15
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
V
Financial Services industry group
22.05
- V
- 22.05
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | NMR | V |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.83 | 34.31 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 17.18 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.15 | 22.05 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |