NMR vs. NTRS: Nomura vs. Northern Trust Stock Comparison
How do Nomura (NMR) and Northern Trust (NTRS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Nomura (NMR) and Northern Trust (NTRS) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though NMR is classified under Investment Banking & Brokerage while NTRS falls under Asset Management & Custody Banks.
Northern Trust (NTRS) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | NMR | NTRS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Nomura Holdings, Inc. Sponsored ADR | Northern Trust Corporation |
| Country/Region | Japan | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Capital Markets | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Investment Banking & Brokerage | Asset Management & Custody Banks |
| Market Capitalization | 27.53 billion USD | 31.29 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | December 17, 2001 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | NMR | NTRS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 35.42% | 39.45% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 37.86% | 40.68% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.78% | 11.05% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | NMR | NTRS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 29.52% | 24.90% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.79 | 1.18 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -38.40% | -50.03% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 789.26K | 1.11M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | NMR | NTRS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.06 | 1.41 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.55 | 2.17 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Nomura (NMR) at 11.51% and Northern Trust (NTRS) at 18.44% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
11.51%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- NMR
- 11.51%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
NTRS
Financial Services industry group
18.44%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- NTRS
- 18.44%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Nomura (NMR) at 17.12% and Northern Trust (NTRS) at 26.00% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
17.12%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- NMR
- 17.12%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
NTRS
Financial Services industry group
26.00%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- NTRS
- 26.00%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Nomura (NMR) at 24.36% and Northern Trust (NTRS) at 34.80% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
24.36%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- NMR
- 24.36%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
NTRS
Financial Services industry group
34.80%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- NTRS
- 34.80%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | NMR | NTRS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 11.51% | 18.44% |
| ROA (TTM) | 0.68% | 1.44% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 17.12% | 26.00% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 24.36% | 34.80% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Northern Trust (NTRS) at -2.46% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% and Northern Trust (NTRS) at -10.54% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | NMR | NTRS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 10.80% | -2.46% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 17.17% | 6.15% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 7.17% | -10.54% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 58.75% | 12.49% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services and Northern Trust (NTRS) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services and Northern Trust (NTRS) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | NMR | NTRS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Northern Trust (NTRS) at 1.91% pays an industry-typical yield; Nomura (NMR) at 620.40% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
620.40%
- NMR
- 620.40%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NTRS
Financial Services industry group
1.91%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- NTRS
- 1.91%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Nomura (NMR) at 16.85% and Northern Trust (NTRS) at 25.73% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
16.85%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- NMR
- 16.85%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NTRS
Financial Services industry group
25.73%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- NTRS
- 25.73%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | NMR | NTRS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 620.40% | 1.91% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 16.85% | 25.73% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 and Northern Trust (NTRS) at 13.55 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
10.83
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- NMR
- 10.83
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
NTRS
Financial Services industry group
13.55
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- NTRS
- 13.55
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Northern Trust (NTRS) at 3.35 prices around its industry’s middle — NMR costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
0.01
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- NMR
- 0.01
- Min
- -0.55
NTRS
Financial Services industry group
3.35
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- NTRS
- 3.35
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 and Northern Trust (NTRS) at 2.51 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
1.15
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 1.57
- NMR
- 1.15
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
NTRS
Financial Services industry group
2.51
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- NTRS
- 2.51
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | NMR | NTRS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.83 | 13.55 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 3.35 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.15 | 2.51 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |