MPC vs. PSX: Marathon Petroleum vs. Phillips 66 Stock Comparison
How do Marathon Petroleum (MPC) and Phillips 66 (PSX) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) and Phillips 66 (PSX) are both classified in the Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing sub-industry within the broader Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | MPC | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Marathon Petroleum Corp. | Phillips 66 |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Market Capitalization | 101.49 billion USD | 95.85 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 24, 2011 | April 12, 2012 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | MPC | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 104.94% | 88.91% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 42.97% | 36.18% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 45.42% | 30.83% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | MPC | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 37.53% | 33.42% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.56 | 0.72 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -44.75% | -44.37% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.56M | 2.92M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | MPC | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 2.68 | 2.53 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 4.10 | 3.93 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 60.46% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Phillips 66 (PSX) at 39.84% also sits in the top quartile.
MPC
Energy industry group
60.46%
- MPC
- 60.46%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
PSX
Energy industry group
39.84%
- Max
- 53.85%
- PSX
- 39.84%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 8.34% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.48% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
MPC
Energy industry group
8.34%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- MPC
- 8.34%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
PSX
Energy industry group
7.48%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- PSX
- 7.48%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 17.98% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 13.17% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
MPC
Energy industry group
17.98%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- MPC
- 17.98%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
PSX
Energy industry group
13.17%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- PSX
- 13.17%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | MPC | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 60.46% | 39.84% |
| ROA (TTM) | 13.75% | 10.64% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.34% | 7.48% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 17.98% | 13.17% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 16.20% | 15.08% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at -4.44% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at -7.53% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 31.15% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 116.23% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | MPC | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -4.44% | -7.53% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.23% | -8.00% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 31.15% | 116.23% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -22.24% | -22.60% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 1.45 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 1.34 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
MPC
Energy industry group
1.45
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- MPC
- 1.45
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
PSX
Energy industry group
1.34
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- PSX
- 1.34
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.52 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 1.15 uses more debt funding than most peers.
MPC
Energy industry group
1.15
- Max
- 1.75
- MPC
- 1.15
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
PSX
Energy industry group
0.52
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- PSX
- 0.52
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | MPC | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.45 | 1.34 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.15 | 0.52 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.88 | 0.82 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 1.09% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.03% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
MPC
Energy industry group
1.09%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- MPC
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PSX
Energy industry group
2.03%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- PSX
- 2.03%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 7.93% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 16.07% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
MPC
Energy industry group
7.93%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- MPC
- 7.93%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PSX
Energy industry group
16.07%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- PSX
- 16.07%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | MPC | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.09% | 2.03% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 7.93% | 16.07% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 7.39 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.88 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for MPC, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
MPC
Energy industry group
7.39
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- MPC
- 7.39
- Min
- 2.99
PSX
Energy industry group
7.88
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- PSX
- 7.88
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 0.58 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.57 fetch a relatively low price per dollar of sales, landing in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.
MPC
Energy industry group
0.58
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- MPC
- 0.58
- Min
- 0.00
PSX
Energy industry group
0.57
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- PSX
- 0.57
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.79 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 4.42 prices even higher, above its industry range.
MPC
Energy industry group
4.42
- MPC
- 4.42
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
PSX
Energy industry group
2.79
- Max
- 4.21
- PSX
- 2.79
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | MPC | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 7.39 | 7.88 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.58 | 0.57 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.42 | 2.79 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 16.00% | 9.93% |