Seek Returns

PSX vs. XOM: Phillips 66 vs. ExxonMobil Stock Comparison

How do Phillips 66 (PSX) and ExxonMobil (XOM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Phillips 66 (PSX) and ExxonMobil (XOM) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though PSX is classified under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing while XOM falls under Integrated Oil & Gas.

Company profile comparison for Phillips 66 (PSX) and ExxonMobil (XOM)
Profile ItemPSXXOM
NamePhillips 66ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Refining & MarketingIntegrated Oil & Gas
Market Capitalization95.85 billion USD676.62 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 12, 2012January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

PSX
XOM
GSPC
Loading price history…
Phillips 66 (PSX) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Phillips 66 (PSX) and ExxonMobil (XOM). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Phillips 66 (PSX) and ExxonMobil (XOM). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Phillips 66 (PSX) and ExxonMobil (XOM)
MetricPSXXOM
Total Return (1Y)88.91%44.48%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)36.18%20.83%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)30.83%24.20%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

PSX
XOM
GSPC
Loading price history…
Phillips 66 (PSX) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Phillips 66 (PSX) and ExxonMobil (XOM). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Phillips 66 (PSX) and ExxonMobil (XOM)
MetricPSXXOM
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)33.42%27.17%
Beta (5Y)0.720.19
Max Drawdown (5Y)-44.37%-20.51%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.92M13.57M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
PSX and XOM are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Phillips 66 (PSX) and ExxonMobil (XOM)
MetricPSXXOM
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)2.531.48
Sortino Ratio (1Y)3.932.17

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 39.84% sits in the top ROE quartile, while ExxonMobil (XOM) at 15.53% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PSX.

PSX

Energy industry group

39.84%

Max
53.85%
PSX
39.84%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

XOM

Energy industry group

15.53%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
XOM
15.53%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Phillips 66 (PSX) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.48% and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 10.46% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

PSX

Energy industry group

7.48%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
PSX
7.48%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

XOM

Energy industry group

10.46%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
XOM
10.46%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Phillips 66 (PSX) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Phillips 66 (PSX) at 13.17% and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 16.98% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

PSX

Energy industry group

13.17%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
PSX
13.17%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

XOM

Energy industry group

16.98%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
XOM
16.98%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Phillips 66 (PSX) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Phillips 66 (PSX) and ExxonMobil (XOM)
MetricPSXXOM
ROE (TTM)39.84%15.53%
ROA (TTM)10.64%6.75%
Net Margin (TTM)7.48%10.46%
Operating Margin (TTM)13.17%16.98%
Gross Margin (TTM)15.08%29.81%

Growth

Revenue Growth

ExxonMobil (XOM) at -4.52% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at -7.53% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Phillips 66 (PSX) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 116.23% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while ExxonMobil (XOM) at -14.54% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for PSX.

Loading chart…
Phillips 66 (PSX) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Phillips 66 (PSX) and ExxonMobil (XOM)
MetricPSXXOM
Revenue Growth (YoY)-7.53%-4.52%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-8.00%-6.69%
EPS Growth (YoY)116.23%-14.54%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-22.60%-20.35%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Phillips 66 (PSX) at 1.34 and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 1.19 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

PSX

Energy industry group

1.34

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
PSX
1.34
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

XOM

Energy industry group

1.19

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
XOM
1.19
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Phillips 66 (PSX) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

ExxonMobil (XOM) at 0.13 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.52 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

PSX

Energy industry group

0.52

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
PSX
0.52
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

XOM

Energy industry group

0.13

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
XOM
0.13
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Phillips 66 (PSX) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Phillips 66 (PSX) and ExxonMobil (XOM)
MetricPSXXOM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.341.19
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.520.13
Net Debt / EBITDA0.820.28

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.03% and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 2.49% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

PSX

Energy industry group

2.03%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
PSX
2.03%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

XOM

Energy industry group

2.49%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
XOM
2.49%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Phillips 66 (PSX) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Phillips 66 (PSX) at 16.07% and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 42.39% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

PSX

Energy industry group

16.07%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
PSX
16.07%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

XOM

Energy industry group

42.39%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
XOM
42.39%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Phillips 66 (PSX) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Phillips 66 (PSX) and ExxonMobil (XOM)
MetricPSXXOM
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.03%2.49%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)16.07%42.39%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.88 and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 17.06 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

PSX

Energy industry group

7.88

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
PSX
7.88
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

XOM

Energy industry group

17.06

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
XOM
17.06
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Phillips 66 (PSX) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.57 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while ExxonMobil (XOM) at 1.74 prices around its industry’s middle — PSX costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

PSX

Energy industry group

0.57

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
PSX
0.57
Min
0.00

XOM

Energy industry group

1.74

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
XOM
1.74
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Phillips 66 (PSX) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.79 and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 2.55 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

PSX

Energy industry group

2.79

Max
4.21
PSX
2.79
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

XOM

Energy industry group

2.55

Max
4.21
XOM
2.55
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Phillips 66 (PSX) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Phillips 66 (PSX) and ExxonMobil (XOM)
MetricPSXXOM
P/E Ratio (TTM)7.8817.06
P/S Ratio (TTM)0.571.74
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.792.55
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)9.93%4.19%