MET vs. WTW: MetLife vs. Willis Towers Watson Stock Comparison
How do MetLife (MET) and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
MetLife (MET) and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) both belong to the Insurance industry, though MET is classified under Life & Health Insurance while WTW falls under Insurance Brokers.
| Profile Item | MET | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | MetLife, Inc. | Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company |
| Country/Region | United States | United Kingdom |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Insurance | Insurance |
| GICS Industry | Insurance | Insurance |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Life & Health Insurance | Insurance Brokers |
| Market Capitalization | 61.76 billion USD | 30.33 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | April 5, 2000 | June 12, 2001 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | MET | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 38.57% | 2.59% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 23.59% | 12.90% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 13.62% | 8.63% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | MET | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 24.21% | 31.09% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 0.42 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -35.09% | -30.39% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.05M | 537.05K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | MET | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.42 | -0.05 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.10 | -0.07 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both MetLife (MET) at 19.92% and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 20.18% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
MET
Insurance industry group
19.92%
- Max
- 41.68%
- Q3
- 22.04%
- MET
- 19.92%
- Median
- 14.81%
- Q1
- 8.79%
- Min
- -10.66%
WTW
Insurance industry group
20.18%
- Max
- 41.68%
- Q3
- 22.04%
- WTW
- 20.18%
- Median
- 14.81%
- Q1
- 8.79%
- Min
- -10.66%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both MetLife (MET) at 6.21% and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 15.22% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
MET
Insurance industry group
6.21%
- Max
- 29.92%
- Q3
- 17.03%
- Median
- 10.97%
- MET
- 6.21%
- Q1
- 6.21%
- Min
- -4.68%
WTW
Insurance industry group
15.22%
- Max
- 29.92%
- Q3
- 17.03%
- WTW
- 15.22%
- Median
- 10.97%
- Q1
- 6.21%
- Min
- -4.68%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for MetLife (MET) in Insurance and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) in Insurance, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | MET | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 19.92% | 20.18% |
| ROA (TTM) | 0.60% | 5.35% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 6.21% | 15.22% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
MetLife (MET) at 7.88% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at -2.24% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: MetLife (MET) reports EPS growth of -21.04%, ranked against its industry; Willis Towers Watson (WTW) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | MET | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.88% | -2.24% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 3.92% | 3.07% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -21.04% | -- |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 18.50% | 21.88% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: MetLife (MET) in Insurance and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) in Insurance both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: MetLife (MET) in Insurance and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) in Insurance run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | MET | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both MetLife (MET) at 0.57% and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 0.29% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
MET
Insurance industry group
0.57%
- Max
- 5.12%
- Q3
- 2.15%
- Median
- 0.98%
- MET
- 0.57%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WTW
Insurance industry group
0.29%
- Max
- 5.12%
- Q3
- 2.15%
- Median
- 0.98%
- WTW
- 0.29%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both MetLife (MET) at 30.33% and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 23.34% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
MET
Insurance industry group
30.33%
- Max
- 76.67%
- Q3
- 35.18%
- MET
- 30.33%
- Median
- 14.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WTW
Insurance industry group
23.34%
- Max
- 76.67%
- Q3
- 35.18%
- WTW
- 23.34%
- Median
- 14.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | MET | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.57% | 0.29% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 30.33% | 23.34% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
MetLife (MET) at 12.85 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 20.20 sits in the richer quartile — WTW needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
MET
Insurance industry group
12.85
- Max
- 28.37
- Q3
- 18.75
- MET
- 12.85
- Median
- 12.23
- Q1
- 9.08
- Min
- 2.32
WTW
Insurance industry group
20.20
- Max
- 28.37
- WTW
- 20.20
- Q3
- 18.75
- Median
- 12.23
- Q1
- 9.08
- Min
- 2.32
P/S Ratio (TTM)
MetLife (MET) at 0.75 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 2.95 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.
MET
Insurance industry group
0.75
- Max
- 4.03
- Q3
- 2.25
- Median
- 1.23
- Q1
- 0.85
- MET
- 0.75
- Min
- 0.07
WTW
Insurance industry group
2.95
- Max
- 4.03
- WTW
- 2.95
- Q3
- 2.25
- Median
- 1.23
- Q1
- 0.85
- Min
- 0.07
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
MetLife (MET) at 2.79 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 3.91 carries an above-peer premium to book — WTW is pricier on assets.
MET
Insurance industry group
2.79
- Max
- 5.07
- Q3
- 2.79
- MET
- 2.79
- Median
- 1.76
- Q1
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.30
WTW
Insurance industry group
3.91
- Max
- 5.07
- WTW
- 3.91
- Q3
- 2.79
- Median
- 1.76
- Q1
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.30
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | MET | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 12.85 | 20.20 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.75 | 2.95 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.79 | 3.91 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |