MET vs. MKL: MetLife vs. Markel Stock Comparison
How do MetLife (MET) and Markel (MKL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
MetLife (MET) and Markel (MKL) both belong to the Insurance industry, though MET is classified under Life & Health Insurance while MKL falls under Property & Casualty Insurance.
| Profile Item | MET | MKL |
|---|---|---|
| Name | MetLife, Inc. | Markel Group Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Insurance | Insurance |
| GICS Industry | Insurance | Insurance |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Life & Health Insurance | Property & Casualty Insurance |
| Market Capitalization | 61.76 billion USD | 23.71 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | April 5, 2000 | December 12, 1986 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | MET | MKL |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 38.57% | -4.35% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 23.59% | 13.21% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 13.62% | 8.36% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
MetLife (MET) trades around 3.05M shares per day on average, while Markel (MKL) sees only 66.79K — a volume gap that can matter for position sizing, exit liquidity, and order execution.
| Metric | MET | MKL |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 24.21% | 18.61% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 0.57 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -35.09% | -28.87% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.05M | 66.79K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | MET | MKL |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.42 | -0.46 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.10 | -0.60 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both MetLife (MET) at 19.92% and Markel (MKL) at 9.75% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
MET
Insurance industry group
19.92%
- Max
- 41.68%
- Q3
- 22.04%
- MET
- 19.92%
- Median
- 14.81%
- Q1
- 8.79%
- Min
- -10.66%
MKL
Insurance industry group
9.75%
- Max
- 41.68%
- Q3
- 22.04%
- Median
- 14.81%
- MKL
- 9.75%
- Q1
- 8.79%
- Min
- -10.66%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both MetLife (MET) at 6.21% and Markel (MKL) at 11.13% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
MET
Insurance industry group
6.21%
- Max
- 29.92%
- Q3
- 17.03%
- Median
- 10.97%
- MET
- 6.21%
- Q1
- 6.21%
- Min
- -4.68%
MKL
Insurance industry group
11.13%
- Max
- 29.92%
- Q3
- 17.03%
- MKL
- 11.13%
- Median
- 10.97%
- Q1
- 6.21%
- Min
- -4.68%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for MetLife (MET) in Insurance and Markel (MKL) in Insurance, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | MET | MKL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 19.92% | 9.75% |
| ROA (TTM) | 0.60% | 2.21% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 6.21% | 11.13% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
MetLife (MET) at 7.88% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Markel (MKL) at -2.49% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both MetLife (MET) at -21.04% and Markel (MKL) at -15.10% post bottom-quartile EPS growth versus peers, pointing to weaker earnings momentum than typical rivals.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | MET | MKL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.88% | -2.49% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 3.92% | 11.40% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -21.04% | -15.10% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 18.50% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: MetLife (MET) in Insurance and Markel (MKL) in Insurance both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: MetLife (MET) in Insurance and Markel (MKL) in Insurance run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | MET | MKL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Markel (MKL) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile MetLife (MET) reports a yield of 0.57%, ranking against industry peers normally.
MET
Insurance industry group
0.57%
- Max
- 5.12%
- Q3
- 2.15%
- Median
- 0.98%
- MET
- 0.57%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MKL
Insurance industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 5.12%
- Q3
- 2.15%
- Median
- 0.98%
- MKL
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Markel (MKL) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile MetLife (MET) reports a payout of 30.33%, ranking against industry peers normally.
MET
Insurance industry group
30.33%
- Max
- 76.67%
- Q3
- 35.18%
- MET
- 30.33%
- Median
- 14.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MKL
Insurance industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 76.67%
- Q3
- 35.18%
- Median
- 14.74%
- MKL
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | MET | MKL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.57% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 30.33% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both MetLife (MET) at 12.85 and Markel (MKL) at 13.80 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
MET
Insurance industry group
12.85
- Max
- 28.37
- Q3
- 18.75
- MET
- 12.85
- Median
- 12.23
- Q1
- 9.08
- Min
- 2.32
MKL
Insurance industry group
13.80
- Max
- 28.37
- Q3
- 18.75
- MKL
- 13.80
- Median
- 12.23
- Q1
- 9.08
- Min
- 2.32
P/S Ratio (TTM)
MetLife (MET) at 0.75 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Markel (MKL) at 1.47 prices around its industry’s middle — MET costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
MET
Insurance industry group
0.75
- Max
- 4.03
- Q3
- 2.25
- Median
- 1.23
- Q1
- 0.85
- MET
- 0.75
- Min
- 0.07
MKL
Insurance industry group
1.47
- Max
- 4.03
- Q3
- 2.25
- MKL
- 1.47
- Median
- 1.23
- Q1
- 0.85
- Min
- 0.07
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both MetLife (MET) at 2.79 and Markel (MKL) at 1.28 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
MET
Insurance industry group
2.79
- Max
- 5.07
- Q3
- 2.79
- MET
- 2.79
- Median
- 1.76
- Q1
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.30
MKL
Insurance industry group
1.28
- Max
- 5.07
- Q3
- 2.79
- Median
- 1.76
- MKL
- 1.28
- Q1
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.30
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | MET | MKL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 12.85 | 13.80 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.75 | 1.47 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.79 | 1.28 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |