MAR vs. YUMC: Marriott vs. Yum China Stock Comparison
How do Marriott (MAR) and Yum China (YUMC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Marriott (MAR) and Yum China (YUMC) both belong to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, though MAR is classified under Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines while YUMC falls under Restaurants.
| Profile Item | MAR | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Marriott International, Inc. Class A Common Stock | Yum China Holdings, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | China |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry Group | Consumer Services | Consumer Services |
| GICS Industry | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines | Restaurants |
| Market Capitalization | 107.24 billion USD | 16.79 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 23, 1998 | October 17, 2016 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | MAR | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 45.32% | 17.02% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 30.45% | 6.80% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 21.58% | -0.60% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | MAR | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 26.94% | 25.40% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 0.01 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -30.50% | -53.84% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.51M | 1.59M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | MAR | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.52 | 0.50 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.46 | 0.77 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Yum China (YUMC) earns 17.35% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Marriott (MAR) has no ROE this period.
MAR
Consumer Services industry group
--
- Max
- 76.75%
- Q3
- 34.07%
- Median
- 15.90%
- Q1
- 3.23%
- Min
- -40.61%
- MAR
- --
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
17.35%
- Max
- 76.75%
- Q3
- 34.07%
- YUMC
- 17.35%
- Median
- 15.90%
- Q1
- 3.23%
- Min
- -40.61%
Net Margin (TTM)
Marriott (MAR) at 35.00% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Yum China (YUMC) at 7.90% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.
MAR
Consumer Services industry group
35.00%
- MAR
- 35.00%
- Max
- 25.52%
- Q3
- 12.95%
- Median
- 6.63%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -14.36%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
7.90%
- Max
- 25.52%
- Q3
- 12.95%
- YUMC
- 7.90%
- Median
- 6.63%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -14.36%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Marriott (MAR) at 66.18% turns sales into operating profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Yum China (YUMC) at 13.09% operates around its industry’s norm.
MAR
Consumer Services industry group
66.18%
- MAR
- 66.18%
- Max
- 49.05%
- Q3
- 24.35%
- Median
- 14.23%
- Q1
- 5.67%
- Min
- -16.47%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
13.09%
- Max
- 49.05%
- Q3
- 24.35%
- Median
- 14.23%
- YUMC
- 13.09%
- Q1
- 5.67%
- Min
- -16.47%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | MAR | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | -- | 17.35% |
| ROA (TTM) | 9.94% | 7.81% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 35.00% | 7.90% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 66.18% | 13.09% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 78.83% | 20.45% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Marriott (MAR) at 4.33% and Yum China (YUMC) at 4.37% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Marriott (MAR) at 14.17% and Yum China (YUMC) at 7.73% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | MAR | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 4.33% | 4.37% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.02% | 7.23% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 14.17% | 7.73% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.52% | 34.14% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Marriott (MAR) at 0.53 and Yum China (YUMC) at 0.67 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
MAR
Consumer Services industry group
0.53
- Max
- 3.41
- Q3
- 1.85
- Median
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.72
- MAR
- 0.53
- Min
- 0.22
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
0.67
- Max
- 3.41
- Q3
- 1.85
- Median
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.72
- YUMC
- 0.67
- Min
- 0.22
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Yum China (YUMC) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.54 against its industry range, while Marriott (MAR) reports no figure this period.
MAR
Consumer Services industry group
--
- Max
- 6.12
- Q3
- 2.93
- Median
- 1.29
- Q1
- 0.37
- Min
- 0.01
- MAR
- --
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
0.54
- Max
- 6.12
- Q3
- 2.93
- Median
- 1.29
- YUMC
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.37
- Min
- 0.01
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | MAR | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.53 | 0.67 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | 0.54 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.49 | 0.85 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Yum China (YUMC) at 2.23% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Marriott (MAR) at 0.67% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, YUMC the richer one.
MAR
Consumer Services industry group
0.67%
- Max
- 4.10%
- Q3
- 1.82%
- MAR
- 0.67%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
2.23%
- Max
- 4.10%
- YUMC
- 2.23%
- Q3
- 1.82%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Marriott (MAR) at 27.92% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Yum China (YUMC) at 38.54% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
MAR
Consumer Services industry group
27.92%
- Max
- 89.80%
- Q3
- 36.83%
- MAR
- 27.92%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
38.54%
- Max
- 89.80%
- YUMC
- 38.54%
- Q3
- 36.83%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | MAR | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.67% | 2.23% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 27.92% | 38.54% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Yum China (YUMC) at 17.34 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Marriott (MAR) at 41.52 sits in the richer quartile — MAR needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
MAR
Consumer Services industry group
41.52
- Max
- 71.70
- MAR
- 41.52
- Q3
- 37.12
- Median
- 21.88
- Q1
- 13.00
- Min
- 5.72
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
17.34
- Max
- 71.70
- Q3
- 37.12
- Median
- 21.88
- YUMC
- 17.34
- Q1
- 13.00
- Min
- 5.72
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Yum China (YUMC) at 1.32 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Marriott (MAR) at 14.15 clears its benchmark range — MAR looks notably rich on sales.
MAR
Consumer Services industry group
14.15
- MAR
- 14.15
- Max
- 6.40
- Q3
- 3.01
- Median
- 1.54
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.08
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
1.32
- Max
- 6.40
- Q3
- 3.01
- Median
- 1.54
- YUMC
- 1.32
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.08
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Marriott (MAR) reports a negative P/B ratio of -21.17, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Yum China (YUMC) reports 3.19, ranking against industry peers normally.
MAR
Consumer Services industry group
-21.17
- Max
- 12.02
- Q3
- 5.58
- Median
- 2.37
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- -4.51
- MAR
- -21.17
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
3.19
- Max
- 12.02
- Q3
- 5.58
- YUMC
- 3.19
- Median
- 2.37
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- -4.51
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | MAR | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 41.52 | 17.34 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 14.15 | 1.32 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | -21.17 | 3.19 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.47% | -2.30% |