LTH vs. YUMC: Life Time vs. Yum China Stock Comparison
How do Life Time (LTH) and Yum China (YUMC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Life Time (LTH) and Yum China (YUMC) both belong to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, though LTH is classified under Leisure Facilities while YUMC falls under Restaurants.
| Profile Item | LTH | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. | Yum China Holdings, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | China |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry Group | Consumer Services | Consumer Services |
| GICS Industry | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Leisure Facilities | Restaurants |
| Market Capitalization | 10.58 billion USD | 16.79 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | October 7, 2021 | October 17, 2016 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | LTH | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 84.40% | 17.02% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 51.85% | 6.80% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 19.40% | -0.60% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Life Time (LTH) has an aggressive beta of 1.47, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Yum China (YUMC) is defensive at 0.01 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | LTH | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 37.64% | 25.40% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.47 | 0.01 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -58.36% | -53.84% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.18M | 1.59M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | LTH | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 2.13 | 0.50 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 3.91 | 0.77 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Life Time (LTH) at 13.02% and Yum China (YUMC) at 17.35% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
LTH
Consumer Services industry group
13.02%
- Max
- 76.75%
- Q3
- 34.07%
- Median
- 15.90%
- LTH
- 13.02%
- Q1
- 3.23%
- Min
- -40.61%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
17.35%
- Max
- 76.75%
- Q3
- 34.07%
- YUMC
- 17.35%
- Median
- 15.90%
- Q1
- 3.23%
- Min
- -40.61%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Life Time (LTH) at 12.72% and Yum China (YUMC) at 7.90% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
LTH
Consumer Services industry group
12.72%
- Max
- 25.52%
- Q3
- 12.95%
- LTH
- 12.72%
- Median
- 6.63%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -14.36%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
7.90%
- Max
- 25.52%
- Q3
- 12.95%
- YUMC
- 7.90%
- Median
- 6.63%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -14.36%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Life Time (LTH) at 17.34% and Yum China (YUMC) at 13.09% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
LTH
Consumer Services industry group
17.34%
- Max
- 49.05%
- Q3
- 24.35%
- LTH
- 17.34%
- Median
- 14.23%
- Q1
- 5.67%
- Min
- -16.47%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
13.09%
- Max
- 49.05%
- Q3
- 24.35%
- Median
- 14.23%
- YUMC
- 13.09%
- Q1
- 5.67%
- Min
- -16.47%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | LTH | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 13.02% | 17.35% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.25% | 7.81% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 12.72% | 7.90% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 17.34% | 13.09% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 47.95% | 20.45% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Life Time (LTH) at 14.28% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Yum China (YUMC) at 4.37% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for LTH.
EPS Growth
Life Time (LTH) at 124.32% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Yum China (YUMC) at 7.73% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for LTH.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | LTH | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 14.28% | 4.37% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 18.01% | 7.23% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 124.32% | 7.73% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 34.14% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Life Time (LTH) at 0.73 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Yum China (YUMC) at 0.67 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for YUMC.
LTH
Consumer Services industry group
0.73
- Max
- 3.41
- Q3
- 1.85
- Median
- 1.06
- LTH
- 0.73
- Q1
- 0.72
- Min
- 0.22
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
0.67
- Max
- 3.41
- Q3
- 1.85
- Median
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.72
- YUMC
- 0.67
- Min
- 0.22
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Life Time (LTH) at 1.25 and Yum China (YUMC) at 0.54 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
LTH
Consumer Services industry group
1.25
- Max
- 6.12
- Q3
- 2.93
- Median
- 1.29
- LTH
- 1.25
- Q1
- 0.37
- Min
- 0.01
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
0.54
- Max
- 6.12
- Q3
- 2.93
- Median
- 1.29
- YUMC
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.37
- Min
- 0.01
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | LTH | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.73 | 0.67 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.25 | 0.54 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.54 | 0.85 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Life Time (LTH) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Yum China (YUMC) reports a yield of 2.23%, ranking against industry peers normally.
LTH
Consumer Services industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 4.10%
- Q3
- 1.82%
- LTH
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
2.23%
- Max
- 4.10%
- YUMC
- 2.23%
- Q3
- 1.82%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Life Time (LTH) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Yum China (YUMC) reports a payout of 38.54%, ranking against industry peers normally.
LTH
Consumer Services industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 89.80%
- Q3
- 36.83%
- LTH
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
38.54%
- Max
- 89.80%
- YUMC
- 38.54%
- Q3
- 36.83%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | LTH | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.23% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 38.54% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Life Time (LTH) at 25.47 and Yum China (YUMC) at 17.34 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
LTH
Consumer Services industry group
25.47
- Max
- 71.70
- Q3
- 37.12
- LTH
- 25.47
- Median
- 21.88
- Q1
- 13.00
- Min
- 5.72
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
17.34
- Max
- 71.70
- Q3
- 37.12
- Median
- 21.88
- YUMC
- 17.34
- Q1
- 13.00
- Min
- 5.72
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Yum China (YUMC) at 1.32 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Life Time (LTH) at 3.21 sits in the pricier quartile — LTH costs more per dollar of sales.
LTH
Consumer Services industry group
3.21
- Max
- 6.40
- LTH
- 3.21
- Q3
- 3.01
- Median
- 1.54
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.08
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
1.32
- Max
- 6.40
- Q3
- 3.01
- Median
- 1.54
- YUMC
- 1.32
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.08
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Life Time (LTH) at 3.07 and Yum China (YUMC) at 3.19 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
LTH
Consumer Services industry group
3.07
- Max
- 12.02
- Q3
- 5.58
- LTH
- 3.07
- Median
- 2.37
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- -4.51
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
3.19
- Max
- 12.02
- Q3
- 5.58
- YUMC
- 3.19
- Median
- 2.37
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- -4.51
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LTH | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 25.47 | 17.34 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.21 | 1.32 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.07 | 3.19 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -3.76% | -2.30% |