Seek Returns

IAG vs. SHW: IAMGOLD vs. Sherwin-Williams Stock Comparison

How do IAMGOLD (IAG) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

IAMGOLD (IAG) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) both fall under the Materials industry group, but IAG is classified in Metals & Mining while SHW is classified in Chemicals.

Company profile comparison for IAMGOLD (IAG) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW)
Profile ItemIAGSHW
NameIAMGOLD CorporationThe Sherwin-Williams Company
Country/RegionCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS Industry GroupMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningChemicals
GICS Sub-IndustryGoldSpecialty Chemicals
Market Capitalization10.63 billion USD83.13 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 15, 2003March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

IAG
SHW
GSPC
Loading price history…
IAMGOLD (IAG) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for IAMGOLD (IAG) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for IAMGOLD (IAG) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for IAMGOLD (IAG) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW)
MetricIAGSHW
Total Return (1Y)53.79%5.74%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)103.91%13.18%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)44.74%2.84%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

IAG
SHW
GSPC
Loading price history…
IAMGOLD (IAG) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for IAMGOLD (IAG) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for IAMGOLD (IAG) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW)
MetricIAGSHW
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)64.39%29.59%
Beta (5Y)1.331.02
Max Drawdown (5Y)-73.58%-42.46%
Avg. Volume (3M)5.11M1.72M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
IAG and SHW are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for IAMGOLD (IAG) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW)
MetricIAGSHW
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.770.05
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.170.08

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both companies show strong equity returns, but Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 63.70% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; IAMGOLD (IAG) at 34.91% also sits in the top quartile.

IAG

Materials industry group

34.91%

Max
52.88%
IAG
34.91%
Q3
19.49%
Median
8.76%
Q1
-3.41%
Min
-32.81%

SHW

Materials industry group

63.70%

SHW
63.70%
Max
52.88%
Q3
19.49%
Median
8.76%
Q1
-3.41%
Min
-32.81%
Loading chart…
IAMGOLD (IAG) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their ROE against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

IAMGOLD (IAG) at 34.29% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 10.74%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

IAG

Materials industry group

34.29%

Max
38.66%
IAG
34.29%
Q3
15.98%
Median
5.28%
Q1
0.00%
Min
-20.40%

SHW

Materials industry group

10.74%

Max
38.66%
Q3
15.98%
SHW
10.74%
Median
5.28%
Q1
0.00%
Min
-20.40%
Loading chart…
IAMGOLD (IAG) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their net margin against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

IAMGOLD (IAG) at 43.99% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 17.56%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

IAG

Materials industry group

43.99%

Max
66.70%
IAG
43.99%
Q3
28.92%
Median
12.56%
Q1
3.28%
Min
-14.07%

SHW

Materials industry group

17.56%

Max
66.70%
Q3
28.92%
SHW
17.56%
Median
12.56%
Q1
3.28%
Min
-14.07%
Loading chart…
IAMGOLD (IAG) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their operating margin against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for IAMGOLD (IAG) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW)
MetricIAGSHW
ROE (TTM)34.91%63.70%
ROA (TTM)20.39%9.48%
Net Margin (TTM)34.29%10.74%
Operating Margin (TTM)43.99%17.56%
Gross Margin (TTM)51.82%48.60%

Growth

Revenue Growth

IAMGOLD (IAG) at 74.70% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 2.06% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for IAG.

Loading chart…
IAMGOLD (IAG) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both IAMGOLD (IAG) at -24.00% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at -2.75% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
IAMGOLD (IAG) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for IAMGOLD (IAG) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW)
MetricIAGSHW
Revenue Growth (YoY)74.70%2.06%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)43.83%2.10%
EPS Growth (YoY)-24.00%-2.75%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)--9.95%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IAMGOLD (IAG) at 2.41 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.71 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for SHW.

IAG

Materials industry group

2.41

Max
5.96
Q3
3.30
IAG
2.41
Median
2.24
Q1
1.45
Min
0.16

SHW

Materials industry group

0.71

Max
5.96
Q3
3.30
Median
2.24
Q1
1.45
SHW
0.71
Min
0.16
Loading chart…
IAMGOLD (IAG) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their current ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

IAMGOLD (IAG) at 0.12 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.72 is above its industry debt-to-equity ratio range.

IAG

Materials industry group

0.12

Max
1.98
Q3
0.89
Median
0.47
Q1
0.13
IAG
0.12
Min
0.00

SHW

Materials industry group

3.72

SHW
3.72
Max
1.98
Q3
0.89
Median
0.47
Q1
0.13
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
IAMGOLD (IAG) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for IAMGOLD (IAG) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW)
MetricIAGSHW
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.410.71
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.123.72
Net Debt / EBITDA-0.103.04

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IAMGOLD (IAG) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Sherwin-Williams (SHW) reports a yield of 0.91%, ranking against industry peers normally.

IAG

Materials industry group

0.00%

Max
4.52%
Q3
1.85%
Median
0.38%
IAG
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SHW

Materials industry group

0.91%

Max
4.52%
Q3
1.85%
SHW
0.91%
Median
0.38%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
IAMGOLD (IAG) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IAMGOLD (IAG) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Sherwin-Williams (SHW) reports a payout of 29.35%, ranking against industry peers normally.

IAG

Materials industry group

0.00%

Max
83.62%
Q3
41.37%
Median
9.54%
IAG
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SHW

Materials industry group

29.35%

Max
83.62%
Q3
41.37%
SHW
29.35%
Median
9.54%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
IAMGOLD (IAG) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for IAMGOLD (IAG) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW)
MetricIAGSHW
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.91%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%29.35%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

IAMGOLD (IAG) at 8.34 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 31.66 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for IAG, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

IAG

Materials industry group

8.34

Max
59.00
Q3
32.93
Median
18.82
Q1
11.96
IAG
8.34
Min
3.93

SHW

Materials industry group

31.66

Max
59.00
Q3
32.93
SHW
31.66
Median
18.82
Q1
11.96
Min
3.93
Loading chart…
IAMGOLD (IAG) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both IAMGOLD (IAG) at 2.77 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.34 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

IAG

Materials industry group

2.77

Max
9.62
Q3
4.34
IAG
2.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.73
Min
0.00

SHW

Materials industry group

3.34

Max
9.62
Q3
4.34
SHW
3.34
Median
1.87
Q1
0.73
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
IAMGOLD (IAG) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

IAMGOLD (IAG) at 2.30 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 20.78 prices above its benchmark range — SHW looks rich relative to book.

IAG

Materials industry group

2.30

Max
6.59
Q3
3.55
IAG
2.30
Median
2.08
Q1
1.26
Min
-0.17

SHW

Materials industry group

20.78

SHW
20.78
Max
6.59
Q3
3.55
Median
2.08
Q1
1.26
Min
-0.17
Loading chart…
IAMGOLD (IAG) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for IAMGOLD (IAG) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW)
MetricIAGSHW
P/E Ratio (TTM)8.3431.66
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.773.34
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.3020.78
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)11.69%2.98%