IAG vs. LIN: IAMGOLD vs. Linde Stock Comparison
How do IAMGOLD (IAG) and Linde (LIN) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
IAMGOLD (IAG) and Linde (LIN) both fall under the Materials industry group, but IAG is classified in Metals & Mining while LIN is classified in Chemicals.
| Profile Item | IAG | LIN |
|---|---|---|
| Name | IAMGOLD Corporation | Linde plc |
| Country/Region | Canada | United Kingdom |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Gold | Industrial Gases |
| Market Capitalization | 10.63 billion USD | 236.54 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | July 15, 2003 | June 17, 1992 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | IAG | LIN |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 53.79% | 25.64% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 103.91% | 11.48% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 44.74% | 10.50% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
IAMGOLD (IAG) has an aggressive beta of 1.33, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Linde (LIN) is defensive at 0.67 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | IAG | LIN |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 64.39% | 19.00% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.33 | 0.67 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -73.58% | -22.82% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 5.11M | 2.05M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | IAG | LIN |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.77 | 1.12 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.17 | 1.65 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
IAMGOLD (IAG) at 34.91% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Linde (LIN) at 17.72% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for IAG.
IAG
Materials industry group
34.91%
- Max
- 52.88%
- IAG
- 34.91%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
LIN
Materials industry group
17.72%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- LIN
- 17.72%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both IAMGOLD (IAG) at 34.29% and Linde (LIN) at 19.34% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
IAG
Materials industry group
34.29%
- Max
- 38.66%
- IAG
- 34.29%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
LIN
Materials industry group
19.34%
- Max
- 38.66%
- LIN
- 19.34%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
IAMGOLD (IAG) at 43.99% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Linde (LIN) at 27.97%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
IAG
Materials industry group
43.99%
- Max
- 66.70%
- IAG
- 43.99%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
LIN
Materials industry group
27.97%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- LIN
- 27.97%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | IAG | LIN |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 34.91% | 17.72% |
| ROA (TTM) | 20.39% | 7.17% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 34.29% | 19.34% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 43.99% | 27.97% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 51.82% | 47.86% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
IAMGOLD (IAG) at 74.70% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Linde (LIN) at 2.97% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for IAG.
EPS Growth
Both IAMGOLD (IAG) at -24.00% and Linde (LIN) at 7.27% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | IAG | LIN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 74.70% | 2.97% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 43.83% | 0.62% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -24.00% | 7.27% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 21.08% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
IAMGOLD (IAG) at 2.41 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Linde (LIN) at 0.86 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for LIN.
IAG
Materials industry group
2.41
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- IAG
- 2.41
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
LIN
Materials industry group
0.86
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- LIN
- 0.86
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
IAMGOLD (IAG) at 0.12 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Linde (LIN) at 0.65 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
IAG
Materials industry group
0.12
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- IAG
- 0.12
- Min
- 0.00
LIN
Materials industry group
0.65
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- LIN
- 0.65
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | IAG | LIN |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.41 | 0.86 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.12 | 0.65 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.10 | 1.65 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
IAMGOLD (IAG) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Linde (LIN) reports a yield of 1.21%, ranking against industry peers normally.
IAG
Materials industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- IAG
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LIN
Materials industry group
1.21%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- LIN
- 1.21%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
IAMGOLD (IAG) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Linde (LIN) reports a payout of 41.83%, ranking against industry peers normally.
IAG
Materials industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- IAG
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LIN
Materials industry group
41.83%
- Max
- 83.62%
- LIN
- 41.83%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | IAG | LIN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.21% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 41.83% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
IAMGOLD (IAG) at 8.34 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Linde (LIN) at 34.21 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.
IAG
Materials industry group
8.34
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- IAG
- 8.34
- Min
- 3.93
LIN
Materials industry group
34.21
- Max
- 59.00
- LIN
- 34.21
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
IAMGOLD (IAG) at 2.77 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Linde (LIN) at 6.53 sits in the pricier quartile — LIN costs more per dollar of sales.
IAG
Materials industry group
2.77
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- IAG
- 2.77
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
LIN
Materials industry group
6.53
- Max
- 9.62
- LIN
- 6.53
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
IAMGOLD (IAG) at 2.30 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Linde (LIN) at 6.00 carries an above-peer premium to book — LIN is pricier on assets.
IAG
Materials industry group
2.30
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- IAG
- 2.30
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
LIN
Materials industry group
6.00
- Max
- 6.59
- LIN
- 6.00
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IAG | LIN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 8.34 | 34.21 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.77 | 6.53 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.30 | 6.00 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 11.69% | 1.77% |