FLUT vs. YUMC: Flutter Entertainment vs. Yum China Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Yum China (YUMC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Yum China (YUMC) both belong to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, though FLUT is classified under Casinos & Gaming while YUMC falls under Restaurants.

Company profile comparison for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Yum China (YUMC)
Profile Item	FLUT	YUMC
Name	Flutter Entertainment plc	Yum China Holdings, Inc.
Country/Region	United States	China
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry Group	Consumer Services	Consumer Services
GICS Industry	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure
GICS Sub-Industry	Casinos & Gaming	Restaurants
Market Capitalization	14.21 billion USD	16.79 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	October 4, 2002	October 17, 2016
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FLUT

YUMC

GSPC

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Yum China (YUMC), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Yum China (YUMC). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Yum China (YUMC). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Yum China (YUMC)
Metric	FLUT	YUMC
Total Return (1Y)	-62.98%	17.02%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	-18.39%	6.80%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	-13.45%	-0.60%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FLUT

YUMC

GSPC

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Yum China (YUMC), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Yum China (YUMC). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Yum China (YUMC)
Metric	FLUT	YUMC
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	49.93%	25.40%
Beta (5Y)	1.12	0.01
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-75.94%	-53.84%
Avg. Volume (3M)	2.85M	1.59M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

FLUT and YUMC are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Yum China (YUMC)
Metric	FLUT	YUMC
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	-1.35	0.50
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	-1.68	0.77

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) reports a negative ROE of -13.47%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Yum China (YUMC) reports 17.35%, ranking against industry peers normally.

FLUT

Consumer Services industry group

-13.47%

Max: 76.75%
Q3: 34.07%
Median: 15.90%
Q1: 3.23%
FLUT: -13.47%
Min: -40.61%

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

17.35%

Max: 76.75%
Q3: 34.07%
YUMC: 17.35%
Median: 15.90%
Q1: 3.23%
Min: -40.61%

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their ROE against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) reports a negative net margin of -5.37%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Yum China (YUMC) reports 7.90%, ranking against industry peers normally.

FLUT

Consumer Services industry group

-5.37%

Max: 25.52%
Q3: 12.95%
Median: 6.63%
Q1: 1.46%
FLUT: -5.37%
Min: -14.36%

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

7.90%

Max: 25.52%
Q3: 12.95%
YUMC: 7.90%
Median: 6.63%
Q1: 1.46%
Min: -14.36%

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their net margin against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) reports a negative operating margin of -8.21%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Yum China (YUMC) reports 13.09%, ranking against industry peers normally.

FLUT

Consumer Services industry group

-8.21%

Max: 49.05%
Q3: 24.35%
Median: 14.23%
Q1: 5.67%
FLUT: -8.21%
Min: -16.47%

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

13.09%

Max: 49.05%
Q3: 24.35%
Median: 14.23%
YUMC: 13.09%
Q1: 5.67%
Min: -16.47%

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their operating margin against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Yum China (YUMC)
Metric	FLUT	YUMC
ROE (TTM)	-13.47%	17.35%
ROA (TTM)	-0.18%	7.81%
Net Margin (TTM)	-5.37%	7.90%
Operating Margin (TTM)	-8.21%	13.09%
Gross Margin (TTM)	41.63%	20.45%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) at 16.62% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Yum China (YUMC) at 4.37% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FLUT.

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Yum China (YUMC) at 7.73% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) at -829.17% falls below its industry range, a notably weak earnings reading.

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Yum China (YUMC)
Metric	FLUT	YUMC
Revenue Growth (YoY)	16.62%	4.37%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	20.08%	7.23%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-829.17%	7.73%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	--	34.14%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) at 0.91 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Yum China (YUMC) at 0.67 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for YUMC.

FLUT

Consumer Services industry group

0.91

Max: 3.41
Q3: 1.85
Median: 1.06
FLUT: 0.91
Q1: 0.72
Min: 0.22

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

0.67

Max: 3.41
Q3: 1.85
Median: 1.06
Q1: 0.72
YUMC: 0.67
Min: 0.22

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their current ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) at 1.56 and Yum China (YUMC) at 0.54 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

FLUT

Consumer Services industry group

1.56

Max: 6.12
Q3: 2.93
FLUT: 1.56
Median: 1.29
Q1: 0.37
Min: 0.01

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

0.54

Max: 6.12
Q3: 2.93
Median: 1.29
YUMC: 0.54
Q1: 0.37
Min: 0.01

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Yum China (YUMC)
Metric	FLUT	YUMC
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.91	0.67
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	1.56	0.54
Net Debt / EBITDA	7.06	0.85

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Yum China (YUMC) reports a yield of 2.23%, ranking against industry peers normally.

FLUT

Consumer Services industry group

0.00%

Max: 4.10%
Q3: 1.82%
FLUT: 0.00%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

2.23%

Max: 4.10%
YUMC: 2.23%
Q3: 1.82%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Yum China (YUMC) reports a payout of 38.54%, ranking against industry peers normally.

FLUT

Consumer Services industry group

0.00%

Max: 89.80%
Q3: 36.83%
FLUT: 0.00%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

38.54%

Max: 89.80%
YUMC: 38.54%
Q3: 36.83%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Yum China (YUMC)
Metric	FLUT	YUMC
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	2.23%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	38.54%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Yum China (YUMC) trades at 17.34 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) has no P/E ratio this period.

FLUT

Consumer Services industry group

Max: 71.70
Q3: 37.12
Median: 21.88
Q1: 13.00
Min: 5.72
FLUT: --

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

17.34

Max: 71.70
Q3: 37.12
Median: 21.88
YUMC: 17.34
Q1: 13.00
Min: 5.72

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Yum China (YUMC): FLUT does not report P/E ratio, so it has no value marker; YUMC is benchmarked against the Consumer Services industry group.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) at 0.82 and Yum China (YUMC) at 1.32 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

FLUT

Consumer Services industry group

0.82

Max: 6.40
Q3: 3.01
Median: 1.54
FLUT: 0.82
Q1: 0.74
Min: 0.08

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

1.32

Max: 6.40
Q3: 3.01
Median: 1.54
YUMC: 1.32
Q1: 0.74
Min: 0.08

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) at 1.79 and Yum China (YUMC) at 3.19 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

FLUT

Consumer Services industry group

1.79

Max: 12.02
Q3: 5.58
Median: 2.37
FLUT: 1.79
Q1: 1.09
Min: -4.51

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

3.19

Max: 12.02
Q3: 5.58
YUMC: 3.19
Median: 2.37
Q1: 1.09
Min: -4.51

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Yum China (YUMC)
Metric	FLUT	YUMC
P/E Ratio (TTM)	--	17.34
P/S Ratio (TTM)	0.82	1.32
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	1.79	3.19
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	-7.47%	-2.30%