FITB vs. SMFG: Fifth Third Bancorp vs. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) are both classified in the Diversified Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) trades as ordinary local shares, while Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) at 9.42% and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) at 8.57% produce bottom-quartile ROE versus peers, pointing to weaker profit generation on shareholders’ equity.

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) at 27.82% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) at 22.97% retains only a bottom-quartile share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) in Banks and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) at 6.61% and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) at 14.32% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) at 36.62% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) at 12.42% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for SMFG.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) in Banks and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) in Banks and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) at 3.03% pays an industry-typical yield; Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) at 334.33% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) at 33.62% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) at 54.36% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) at 13.47 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) at 17.80 sits in the richer quartile — FITB needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) in Banks and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

On P/B ratio, both Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) at 1.55 and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) at 1.45 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics