FITB vs. ING: Fifth Third Bancorp vs. ING Groep Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) and ING Groep (ING) are both classified in the Diversified Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) trades as ordinary local shares, while ING Groep (ING) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

ING Groep (ING) at 17.76% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) at 9.42% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in returns on equity.

ING Groep (ING) at 34.40% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) at 22.97% retains only a bottom-quartile share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) in Banks and ING Groep (ING) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) at 6.61% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while ING Groep (ING) at 1.55% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Both Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) at 12.42% and ING Groep (ING) at 7.07% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) in Banks and ING Groep (ING) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) in Banks and ING Groep (ING) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

ING Groep (ING) at 4.55% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) at 3.03% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, ING the richer one.

Both Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) at 54.36% and ING Groep (ING) at 48.14% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

ING Groep (ING) at 11.70 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) at 17.80 sits in the richer quartile — FITB needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) in Banks and ING Groep (ING) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) at 1.55 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while ING Groep (ING) at 1.61 carries an above-peer premium to book — ING is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics