ECHO vs. ZTO: EchoStar vs. ZTO Express (Cayman) Stock Comparison

Company Profile

EchoStar (ECHO) and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) are both classified in the Air Freight & Logistics sub-industry within the broader Air Freight & Logistics industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

EchoStar (ECHO) trades as ordinary local shares, while ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) reports a negative beta of -0.18, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. EchoStar (ECHO) has a non-negative beta of 1.08.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

EchoStar (ECHO) at 82.35% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 16.28%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

EchoStar (ECHO) at 81.29% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 19.04% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.

Both EchoStar (ECHO) at 13.82% and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 22.19% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 10.88% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while EchoStar (ECHO) at -5.18% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Only one side can be read here: ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) reports EPS growth of 4.58%, ranked against its industry; EchoStar (ECHO) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both EchoStar (ECHO) at 10.16 and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 1.67 post current ratio above their industries’ typical mid-ranges — short-term liquidity appears comfortable, though unusually high readings can point to idle current assets.

Both EchoStar (ECHO) at 0.57 and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 0.35 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

EchoStar (ECHO) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) reports a yield of 12.89%, ranking against industry peers normally.

EchoStar (ECHO) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) reports a payout of 38.36%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

EchoStar (ECHO) at 3.43 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 11.37 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for ECHO, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 0.29 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while EchoStar (ECHO) at 2.26 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

On P/B ratio, both EchoStar (ECHO) at 1.62 and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 1.66 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics