Seek Returns

CVE vs. PSX: Cenovus Energy vs. Phillips 66 Stock Comparison

How do Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Phillips 66 (PSX) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Phillips 66 (PSX) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though CVE is classified under Integrated Oil & Gas while PSX falls under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing.

Company profile comparison for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
Profile ItemCVEPSX
NameCenovus Energy Inc.Phillips 66
Country/RegionCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryIntegrated Oil & GasOil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Market Capitalization49.61 billion USD95.85 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 17, 2009April 12, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CVE
PSX
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCVEPSX
Total Return (1Y)60.99%88.91%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)19.41%36.18%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)18.63%30.83%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CVE
PSX
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCVEPSX
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)37.47%33.42%
Beta (5Y)0.430.72
Max Drawdown (5Y)-53.51%-44.37%
Avg. Volume (3M)6.90M2.92M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CVE and PSX are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCVEPSX
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.512.53
Sortino Ratio (1Y)2.203.93

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 27.44% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 39.84% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

CVE

Energy industry group

27.44%

Max
53.85%
CVE
27.44%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

PSX

Energy industry group

39.84%

Max
53.85%
PSX
39.84%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 15.42% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.48% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

CVE

Energy industry group

15.42%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
CVE
15.42%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

PSX

Energy industry group

7.48%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
PSX
7.48%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 26.58% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 13.17% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

CVE

Energy industry group

26.58%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
CVE
26.58%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

PSX

Energy industry group

13.17%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
PSX
13.17%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCVEPSX
ROE (TTM)27.44%39.84%
ROA (TTM)12.05%10.64%
Net Margin (TTM)15.42%7.48%
Operating Margin (TTM)26.58%13.17%
Gross Margin (TTM)33.92%15.08%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at -8.62% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at -7.53% post bottom-quartile revenue growth versus peers, pointing to weaker demand or pricing momentum than typical rivals.

Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 28.74% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 116.23% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.

Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCVEPSX
Revenue Growth (YoY)-8.62%-7.53%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-9.75%-8.00%
EPS Growth (YoY)28.74%116.23%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-12.42%-22.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.64 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 1.34 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

CVE

Energy industry group

1.64

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
CVE
1.64
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

PSX

Energy industry group

1.34

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
PSX
1.34
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.33 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.52 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

CVE

Energy industry group

0.33

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
CVE
0.33
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

PSX

Energy industry group

0.52

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
PSX
0.52
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCVEPSX
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.641.34
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.330.52
Net Debt / EBITDA0.350.82

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 3.04% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.03% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

CVE

Energy industry group

3.04%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
CVE
3.04%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PSX

Energy industry group

2.03%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
PSX
2.03%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 22.84% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 16.07% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

CVE

Energy industry group

22.84%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
CVE
22.84%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PSX

Energy industry group

16.07%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
PSX
16.07%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCVEPSX
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.04%2.03%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.84%16.07%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 10.56 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.88 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

CVE

Energy industry group

10.56

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
CVE
10.56
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

PSX

Energy industry group

7.88

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
PSX
7.88
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.88 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.57 fetch a relatively low price per dollar of sales, landing in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

CVE

Energy industry group

0.88

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
CVE
0.88
Min
0.00

PSX

Energy industry group

0.57

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
PSX
0.57
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.98 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.79 carries an above-peer premium to book — PSX is pricier on assets.

CVE

Energy industry group

1.98

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
CVE
1.98
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

PSX

Energy industry group

2.79

Max
4.21
PSX
2.79
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCVEPSX
P/E Ratio (TTM)10.567.88
P/S Ratio (TTM)0.880.57
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.982.79
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)20.71%9.93%