CVE vs. XOM: Cenovus Energy vs. ExxonMobil Stock Comparison
How do Cenovus Energy (CVE) and ExxonMobil (XOM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cenovus Energy (CVE) and ExxonMobil (XOM) are both classified in the Integrated Oil & Gas sub-industry within the broader Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | CVE | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cenovus Energy Inc. | ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Integrated Oil & Gas | Integrated Oil & Gas |
| Market Capitalization | 49.61 billion USD | 676.62 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 17, 2009 | January 2, 1962 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CVE | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 60.99% | 44.48% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.41% | 20.83% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.63% | 24.20% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CVE | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 37.47% | 27.17% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.43 | 0.19 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -53.51% | -20.51% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.90M | 13.57M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CVE | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.51 | 1.48 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.20 | 2.17 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 27.44% sits in the top ROE quartile, while ExxonMobil (XOM) at 15.53% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CVE.
CVE
Energy industry group
27.44%
- Max
- 53.85%
- CVE
- 27.44%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
XOM
Energy industry group
15.53%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- XOM
- 15.53%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 15.42% and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 10.46% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
15.42%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- CVE
- 15.42%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
XOM
Energy industry group
10.46%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- XOM
- 10.46%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 26.58% and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 16.98% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CVE
Energy industry group
26.58%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- CVE
- 26.58%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
XOM
Energy industry group
16.98%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- XOM
- 16.98%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CVE | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.44% | 15.53% |
| ROA (TTM) | 12.05% | 6.75% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 15.42% | 10.46% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 26.58% | 16.98% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 33.92% | 29.81% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
ExxonMobil (XOM) at -4.52% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at -8.62% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 28.74% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while ExxonMobil (XOM) at -14.54% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CVE.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CVE | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -8.62% | -4.52% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.75% | -6.69% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 28.74% | -14.54% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -12.42% | -20.35% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.64 and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 1.19 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.64
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- CVE
- 1.64
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
XOM
Energy industry group
1.19
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- XOM
- 1.19
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
ExxonMobil (XOM) at 0.13 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.33 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- CVE
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
XOM
Energy industry group
0.13
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- XOM
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CVE | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.64 | 1.19 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.33 | 0.13 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.35 | 0.28 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 3.04% and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 2.49% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CVE
Energy industry group
3.04%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- CVE
- 3.04%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
XOM
Energy industry group
2.49%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- XOM
- 2.49%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 22.84% and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 42.39% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CVE
Energy industry group
22.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- CVE
- 22.84%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
XOM
Energy industry group
42.39%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- XOM
- 42.39%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CVE | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.04% | 2.49% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 22.84% | 42.39% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 10.56 and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 17.06 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
10.56
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- CVE
- 10.56
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
XOM
Energy industry group
17.06
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- XOM
- 17.06
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.88 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while ExxonMobil (XOM) at 1.74 prices around its industry’s middle — CVE costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.88
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- CVE
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
XOM
Energy industry group
1.74
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- XOM
- 1.74
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.98 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while ExxonMobil (XOM) at 2.55 carries an above-peer premium to book — XOM is pricier on assets.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.98
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- CVE
- 1.98
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
XOM
Energy industry group
2.55
- Max
- 4.21
- XOM
- 2.55
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CVE | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.56 | 17.06 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.88 | 1.74 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.98 | 2.55 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 20.71% | 4.19% |