CRS vs. RIO: Carpenter vs. Rio Tinto Stock Comparison
How do Carpenter (CRS) and Rio Tinto (RIO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Carpenter (CRS) and Rio Tinto (RIO) both belong to the Metals & Mining industry, though CRS is classified under Steel while RIO falls under Diversified Metals & Mining.
Carpenter (CRS) trades as ordinary local shares, while Rio Tinto (RIO) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | CRS | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Carpenter Technology Corporation | Rio Tinto plc ADR |
| Country/Region | United States | United Kingdom |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Steel | Diversified Metals & Mining |
| Market Capitalization | 13.79 billion USD | 136.19 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | June 28, 1990 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CRS | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -8.47% | 30.54% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 66.22% | 16.90% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 56.37% | 14.68% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Carpenter (CRS) has an aggressive beta of 1.39, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Rio Tinto (RIO) is defensive at 0.63 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | CRS | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 49.01% | 30.72% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.39 | 0.63 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -55.01% | -35.25% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 913.10K | 2.35M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CRS | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.26 | 0.85 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.36 | 1.26 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Carpenter (CRS) at 27.84% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Rio Tinto (RIO) at 19.31% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CRS.
CRS
Materials industry group
27.84%
- Max
- 52.88%
- CRS
- 27.84%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
RIO
Materials industry group
19.31%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- RIO
- 19.31%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Carpenter (CRS) at 17.87% and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 19.59% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
CRS
Materials industry group
17.87%
- Max
- 38.66%
- CRS
- 17.87%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
RIO
Materials industry group
19.59%
- Max
- 38.66%
- RIO
- 19.59%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Carpenter (CRS) at 24.69% and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 28.05% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CRS
Materials industry group
24.69%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- CRS
- 24.69%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
RIO
Materials industry group
28.05%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- RIO
- 28.05%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CRS | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.84% | 19.31% |
| ROA (TTM) | 12.96% | 8.11% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 17.87% | 19.59% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 24.69% | 28.05% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 31.22% | 29.75% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Carpenter (CRS) at 8.59% and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 7.42% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Carpenter (CRS) at 41.78% and Rio Tinto (RIO) at -13.97% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CRS | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 8.59% | 7.42% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 7.00% | 1.24% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 41.78% | -13.97% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 109.75% | -7.23% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Carpenter (CRS) at 3.94 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Rio Tinto (RIO) at 1.42 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.
CRS
Materials industry group
3.94
- Max
- 5.96
- CRS
- 3.94
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
RIO
Materials industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- RIO
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Carpenter (CRS) at 0.32 and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 0.32 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CRS
Materials industry group
0.32
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- CRS
- 0.32
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
RIO
Materials industry group
0.32
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- RIO
- 0.32
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CRS | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 3.94 | 1.42 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.32 | 0.32 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.62 | 0.58 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Carpenter (CRS) at 0.29% pays an industry-typical yield; Rio Tinto (RIO) at 5.59% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
CRS
Materials industry group
0.29%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- CRS
- 0.29%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RIO
Materials industry group
5.59%
- RIO
- 5.59%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Carpenter (CRS) at 7.05% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Rio Tinto (RIO) at 54.46% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CRS
Materials industry group
7.05%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- CRS
- 7.05%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RIO
Materials industry group
54.46%
- Max
- 83.62%
- RIO
- 54.46%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CRS | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.29% | 5.59% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 7.05% | 54.46% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Rio Tinto (RIO) at 11.35 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Carpenter (CRS) at 24.54 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for RIO, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
CRS
Materials industry group
24.54
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- CRS
- 24.54
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
RIO
Materials industry group
11.35
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- RIO
- 11.35
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Carpenter (CRS) at 4.32 and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 2.20 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CRS
Materials industry group
4.32
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- CRS
- 4.32
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
RIO
Materials industry group
2.20
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- RIO
- 2.20
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Rio Tinto (RIO) at 2.08 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Carpenter (CRS) at 6.32 carries an above-peer premium to book — CRS is pricier on assets.
CRS
Materials industry group
6.32
- Max
- 6.59
- CRS
- 6.32
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
RIO
Materials industry group
2.08
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- RIO
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CRS | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 24.54 | 11.35 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.32 | 2.20 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.32 | 2.08 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 1.54% | 2.64% |