BHP vs. CRS: BHP vs. Carpenter Stock Comparison
How do BHP (BHP) and Carpenter (CRS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
BHP (BHP) and Carpenter (CRS) both belong to the Metals & Mining industry, though BHP is classified under Diversified Metals & Mining while CRS falls under Steel.
Carpenter (CRS) trades as ordinary local shares, while BHP (BHP) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | BHP | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | BHP Group Ltd. Sponsored ADR | Carpenter Technology Corporation |
| Country/Region | Australia | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Diversified Metals & Mining | Steel |
| Market Capitalization | 203.04 billion USD | 13.79 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | February 21, 1973 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BHP | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 55.75% | -8.47% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 17.27% | 66.22% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.05% | 56.37% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | BHP | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 34.60% | 49.01% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 1.39 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -37.21% | -55.01% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.84M | 913.10K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BHP | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.49 | -0.26 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.22 | -0.36 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both BHP (BHP) at 24.00% and Carpenter (CRS) at 27.84% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
BHP
Materials industry group
24.00%
- Max
- 52.88%
- BHP
- 24.00%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
CRS
Materials industry group
27.84%
- Max
- 52.88%
- CRS
- 27.84%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both BHP (BHP) at 16.73% and Carpenter (CRS) at 17.87% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
BHP
Materials industry group
16.73%
- Max
- 38.66%
- BHP
- 16.73%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
CRS
Materials industry group
17.87%
- Max
- 38.66%
- CRS
- 17.87%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
BHP (BHP) at 43.34% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Carpenter (CRS) at 24.69%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
BHP
Materials industry group
43.34%
- Max
- 66.70%
- BHP
- 43.34%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
CRS
Materials industry group
24.69%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- CRS
- 24.69%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BHP | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 24.00% | 27.84% |
| ROA (TTM) | 13.43% | 12.96% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 16.73% | 17.87% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 43.34% | 24.69% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 85.92% | 31.22% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both BHP (BHP) at 14.63% and Carpenter (CRS) at 8.59% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both BHP (BHP) at 8.91% and Carpenter (CRS) at 41.78% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BHP | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 14.63% | 8.59% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 2.97% | 7.00% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 8.91% | 41.78% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -8.80% | 109.75% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
BHP (BHP) at 1.89 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Carpenter (CRS) at 3.94 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
BHP
Materials industry group
1.89
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- BHP
- 1.89
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
CRS
Materials industry group
3.94
- Max
- 5.96
- CRS
- 3.94
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both BHP (BHP) at 0.50 and Carpenter (CRS) at 0.32 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
BHP
Materials industry group
0.50
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- BHP
- 0.50
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
CRS
Materials industry group
0.32
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- CRS
- 0.32
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BHP | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.89 | 3.94 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.50 | 0.32 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.33 | 0.62 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
BHP (BHP) at 2.19% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Carpenter (CRS) at 0.29% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, BHP the richer one.
BHP
Materials industry group
2.19%
- Max
- 4.52%
- BHP
- 2.19%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CRS
Materials industry group
0.29%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- CRS
- 0.29%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Carpenter (CRS) at 7.05% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while BHP (BHP) at 68.84% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
BHP
Materials industry group
68.84%
- Max
- 83.62%
- BHP
- 68.84%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CRS
Materials industry group
7.05%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- CRS
- 7.05%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BHP | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.19% | 0.29% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 68.84% | 7.05% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both BHP (BHP) at 20.70 and Carpenter (CRS) at 24.54 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
BHP
Materials industry group
20.70
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- BHP
- 20.70
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
CRS
Materials industry group
24.54
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- CRS
- 24.54
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both BHP (BHP) at 3.46 and Carpenter (CRS) at 4.32 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
BHP
Materials industry group
3.46
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- BHP
- 3.46
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
CRS
Materials industry group
4.32
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- CRS
- 4.32
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both BHP (BHP) at 3.98 and Carpenter (CRS) at 6.32 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.
BHP
Materials industry group
3.98
- Max
- 6.59
- BHP
- 3.98
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
CRS
Materials industry group
6.32
- Max
- 6.59
- CRS
- 6.32
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BHP | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 20.70 | 24.54 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.46 | 4.32 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.98 | 6.32 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.72% | 1.54% |