Seek Returns

COP vs. PSX: ConocoPhillips vs. Phillips 66 Stock Comparison

How do ConocoPhillips (COP) and Phillips 66 (PSX) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

ConocoPhillips (COP) and Phillips 66 (PSX) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though COP is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while PSX falls under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing.

Company profile comparison for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
Profile ItemCOPPSX
NameConocoPhillipsPhillips 66
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Market Capitalization161.12 billion USD95.85 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 31, 1981April 12, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

COP
PSX
GSPC
Loading price history…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCOPPSX
Total Return (1Y)62.02%88.91%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)9.29%36.18%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)16.40%30.83%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

COP
PSX
GSPC
Loading price history…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCOPPSX
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)31.63%33.42%
Beta (5Y)0.190.72
Max Drawdown (5Y)-36.30%-44.37%
Avg. Volume (3M)6.60M2.92M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
COP and PSX are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCOPPSX
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.832.53
Sortino Ratio (1Y)2.703.93

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 39.84% sits in the top ROE quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 17.66% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PSX.

COP

Energy industry group

17.66%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
COP
17.66%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

PSX

Energy industry group

39.84%

Max
53.85%
PSX
39.84%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 16.76% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.48% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

COP

Energy industry group

16.76%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
COP
16.76%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

PSX

Energy industry group

7.48%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
PSX
7.48%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 30.05% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 13.17% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

COP

Energy industry group

30.05%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
COP
30.05%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

PSX

Energy industry group

13.17%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
PSX
13.17%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCOPPSX
ROE (TTM)17.66%39.84%
ROA (TTM)8.98%10.64%
Net Margin (TTM)16.76%7.48%
Operating Margin (TTM)30.05%13.17%
Gross Margin (TTM)49.01%15.08%

Growth

Revenue Growth

ConocoPhillips (COP) at 7.67% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at -7.53% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 116.23% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at -18.69% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for PSX.

Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCOPPSX
Revenue Growth (YoY)7.67%-7.53%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-9.11%-8.00%
EPS Growth (YoY)-18.69%116.23%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-24.18%-22.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 1.52 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 1.34 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

COP

Energy industry group

1.52

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
COP
1.52
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

PSX

Energy industry group

1.34

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
PSX
1.34
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 0.35 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.52 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

COP

Energy industry group

0.35

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
COP
0.35
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

PSX

Energy industry group

0.52

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
PSX
0.52
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCOPPSX
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.521.34
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.350.52
Net Debt / EBITDA0.450.82

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.48% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.03% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

COP

Energy industry group

2.48%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
COP
2.48%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PSX

Energy industry group

2.03%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
PSX
2.03%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 35.41% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 16.07% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

COP

Energy industry group

35.41%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
COP
35.41%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PSX

Energy industry group

16.07%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
PSX
16.07%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCOPPSX
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.48%2.03%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)35.41%16.07%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 14.36 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.88 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

COP

Energy industry group

14.36

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
COP
14.36
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

PSX

Energy industry group

7.88

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
PSX
7.88
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.57 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.34 prices around its industry’s middle — PSX costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

COP

Energy industry group

2.34

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
COP
2.34
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

PSX

Energy industry group

0.57

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
PSX
0.57
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.44 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.79 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

COP

Energy industry group

2.44

Max
4.21
COP
2.44
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

PSX

Energy industry group

2.79

Max
4.21
PSX
2.79
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCOPPSX
P/E Ratio (TTM)14.367.88
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.340.57
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.442.79
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)7.12%9.93%