COP vs. XOM: ConocoPhillips vs. ExxonMobil Stock Comparison

August 16, 2026

How do ConocoPhillips (COP) and ExxonMobil (XOM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

ConocoPhillips (COP) and ExxonMobil (XOM) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though COP is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while XOM falls under Integrated Oil & Gas.

Company profile comparison for ConocoPhillips (COP) and ExxonMobil (XOM)
Profile Item	COP	XOM
Name	ConocoPhillips	ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry Group	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-Industry	Oil & Gas Exploration & Production	Integrated Oil & Gas
Market Capitalization	152.31 billion USD	658.32 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	December 31, 1981	January 2, 1962
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

COP

XOM

GSPC

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and ExxonMobil (XOM). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and ExxonMobil (XOM). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and ExxonMobil (XOM)
Metric	COP	XOM
Total Return (1Y)	36.94%	53.85%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	5.67%	16.50%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	21.86%	27.27%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

COP

XOM

GSPC

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and ExxonMobil (XOM). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and ExxonMobil (XOM)
Metric	COP	XOM
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	30.49%	25.37%
Beta (5Y)	0.13	0.18
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-36.30%	-20.51%
Avg. Volume (3M)	7.03M	16.22M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

COP and XOM are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and ExxonMobil (XOM)
Metric	COP	XOM
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	1.08	1.97
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	1.58	2.95

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 14.18% and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 12.58% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

COP

Energy industry group

14.18%

Max: 42.10%
Q3: 19.50%
COP: 14.18%
Median: 10.55%
Q1: 1.41%
Min: -24.68%

XOM

Energy industry group

12.58%

Max: 42.10%
Q3: 19.50%
XOM: 12.58%
Median: 10.55%
Q1: 1.41%
Min: -24.68%

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 14.40% and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 9.07% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

COP

Energy industry group

14.40%

Max: 51.35%
Q3: 21.53%
COP: 14.40%
Median: 7.66%
Q1: 0.03%
Min: -31.11%

XOM

Energy industry group

9.07%

Max: 51.35%
Q3: 21.53%
XOM: 9.07%
Median: 7.66%
Q1: 0.03%
Min: -31.11%

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 31.51% and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 15.86% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

COP

Energy industry group

31.51%

Max: 83.65%
Q3: 42.96%
COP: 31.51%
Median: 21.12%
Q1: 8.41%
Min: -9.47%

XOM

Energy industry group

15.86%

Max: 83.65%
Q3: 42.96%
Median: 21.12%
XOM: 15.86%
Q1: 8.41%
Min: -9.47%

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and ExxonMobil (XOM)
Metric	COP	XOM
ROE (TTM)	14.18%	12.58%
ROA (TTM)	7.53%	5.52%
Net Margin (TTM)	14.40%	9.07%
Operating Margin (TTM)	31.51%	15.86%
Gross Margin (TTM)	47.57%	29.77%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 7.67% and ExxonMobil (XOM) at -4.52% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at -18.69% and ExxonMobil (XOM) at -14.54% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and ExxonMobil (XOM)
Metric	COP	XOM
Revenue Growth (YoY)	7.67%	-4.52%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	-9.11%	-6.69%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-18.69%	-14.54%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	-24.18%	-20.35%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 1.54 and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 1.14 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

COP

Energy industry group

1.54

Max: 4.12
Q3: 2.32
COP: 1.54
Median: 1.48
Q1: 0.89
Min: 0.10

XOM

Energy industry group

1.14

Max: 4.12
Q3: 2.32
Median: 1.48
XOM: 1.14
Q1: 0.89
Min: 0.10

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

ExxonMobil (XOM) at 0.16 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 0.36 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

COP

Energy industry group

0.36

Max: 2.02
Q3: 0.99
Median: 0.56
COP: 0.36
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

XOM

Energy industry group

0.16

Max: 2.02
Q3: 0.99
Median: 0.56
Q1: 0.29
XOM: 0.16
Min: 0.00

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and ExxonMobil (XOM)
Metric	COP	XOM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.54	1.14
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	0.36	0.16
Net Debt / EBITDA	0.58	0.47

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.65% and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 2.57% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

COP

Energy industry group

2.65%

Max: 7.36%
Q3: 3.03%
COP: 2.65%
Median: 1.35%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

XOM

Energy industry group

2.57%

Max: 7.36%
Q3: 3.03%
XOM: 2.57%
Median: 1.35%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ConocoPhillips (COP) at 43.65% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while ExxonMobil (XOM) at 52.51% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

COP

Energy industry group

43.65%

Max: 123.08%
Q3: 51.26%
COP: 43.65%
Median: 25.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

XOM

Energy industry group

52.51%

Max: 123.08%
XOM: 52.51%
Q3: 51.26%
Median: 25.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and ExxonMobil (XOM)
Metric	COP	XOM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.65%	2.57%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	43.65%	52.51%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 16.77 and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 20.63 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

COP

Energy industry group

16.77

Max: 51.46
Q3: 27.08
COP: 16.77
Median: 16.36
Q1: 9.34
Min: 1.29

XOM

Energy industry group

20.63

Max: 51.46
Q3: 27.08
XOM: 20.63
Median: 16.36
Q1: 9.34
Min: 1.29

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.36 and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 1.82 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

COP

Energy industry group

2.36

Max: 5.18
Q3: 2.88
COP: 2.36
Median: 1.81
Q1: 1.00
Min: 0.00

XOM

Energy industry group

1.82

Max: 5.18
Q3: 2.88
XOM: 1.82
Median: 1.81
Q1: 1.00
Min: 0.00

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.33 and ExxonMobil (XOM) at 2.54 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

COP

Energy industry group

2.33

Max: 5.10
Q3: 2.84
COP: 2.33
Median: 1.74
Q1: 1.27
Min: 0.01

XOM

Energy industry group

2.54

Max: 5.10
Q3: 2.84
XOM: 2.54
Median: 1.74
Q1: 1.27
Min: 0.01

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and ExxonMobil (XOM)
Metric	COP	XOM
P/E Ratio (TTM)	16.77	20.63
P/S Ratio (TTM)	2.36	1.82
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	2.33	2.54
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	5.05%	3.14%