BNY vs. NMR: Bank of New York Mellon vs. Nomura Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) and Nomura (NMR) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though BNY is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while NMR falls under Investment Banking & Brokerage.

Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) at 14.87% and Nomura (NMR) at 11.51% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) at 29.74% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Nomura (NMR) at 17.12%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Both Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) at 39.07% and Nomura (NMR) at 24.36% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) at 8.22% and Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) at 27.59% and Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) at 1.51% pays an industry-typical yield; Nomura (NMR) at 620.40% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

Both Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) at 24.58% and Nomura (NMR) at 16.85% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) at 16.36 and Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) at 4.52 prices around its industry’s middle — NMR costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

On P/B ratio, both Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) at 2.53 and Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics