BNY vs. GPN: Bank of New York Mellon vs. Global Payments Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) and Global Payments (GPN) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but BNY is classified in Capital Markets while GPN is classified in Financial Services.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) at 14.87% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Global Payments (GPN) at 0.84% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

Global Payments (GPN) reports a negative net margin of -11.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) reports 29.74%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Both Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) at 39.07% and Global Payments (GPN) at 15.73% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) at 8.22% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Global Payments (GPN) at -0.39% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Both Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) at 27.59% and Global Payments (GPN) at -6.17% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) in Financial Services and Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) in Financial Services and Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) at 1.51% and Global Payments (GPN) at 1.05% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

Global Payments (GPN) reports payout ratio above 100% at 178.57%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) reports 24.58%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) at 16.36 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Global Payments (GPN) at 173.93 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for GPN’s trailing earnings.

On P/S ratio, both Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) at 4.52 and Global Payments (GPN) at 2.24 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

On P/B ratio, both Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) at 2.53 and Global Payments (GPN) at 1.11 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics