BHP vs. MT: BHP vs. ArcelorMittal Stock Comparison
How do BHP (BHP) and ArcelorMittal (MT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
BHP (BHP) and ArcelorMittal (MT) both belong to the Metals & Mining industry, though BHP is classified under Diversified Metals & Mining while MT falls under Steel.
Both BHP (BHP) and ArcelorMittal (MT) trade as ADRs — their core financials are comparable, but keep FX, depositary-program fees, and dividend withholding in view for each.
| Profile Item | BHP | MT |
|---|---|---|
| Name | BHP Group Ltd. Sponsored ADR | ArcelorMittal NY Registry Shares |
| Country/Region | Australia | Luxembourg |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Diversified Metals & Mining | Steel |
| Market Capitalization | 203.04 billion USD | 45.85 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | August 7, 1997 |
| Security Type | ADR | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BHP | MT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 55.75% | 65.49% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 17.27% | 45.03% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.05% | 16.55% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | BHP | MT |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 34.60% | 44.08% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 1.49 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -37.21% | -45.99% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.84M | 1.35M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BHP | MT |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.49 | 1.39 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.22 | 2.23 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
BHP (BHP) at 24.00% sits in the top ROE quartile, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.83% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for BHP.
BHP
Materials industry group
24.00%
- Max
- 52.88%
- BHP
- 24.00%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
MT
Materials industry group
1.83%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- MT
- 1.83%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
BHP (BHP) at 16.73% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.64%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
BHP
Materials industry group
16.73%
- Max
- 38.66%
- BHP
- 16.73%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
MT
Materials industry group
1.64%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- MT
- 1.64%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
BHP (BHP) at 43.34% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of ArcelorMittal (MT) at 6.16%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
BHP
Materials industry group
43.34%
- Max
- 66.70%
- BHP
- 43.34%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
MT
Materials industry group
6.16%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- MT
- 6.16%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BHP | MT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 24.00% | 1.83% |
| ROA (TTM) | 13.43% | 1.31% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 16.73% | 1.64% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 43.34% | 6.16% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 85.92% | 8.16% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
BHP (BHP) at 14.63% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at -1.74% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
ArcelorMittal (MT) at 143.20% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while BHP (BHP) at 8.91% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for MT.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BHP | MT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 14.63% | -1.74% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 2.97% | -8.41% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 8.91% | 143.20% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -8.80% | -26.09% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
BHP (BHP) at 1.89 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.41 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for MT.
BHP
Materials industry group
1.89
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- BHP
- 1.89
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
MT
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- MT
- 1.41
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both BHP (BHP) at 0.50 and ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.24 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
BHP
Materials industry group
0.50
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- BHP
- 0.50
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
MT
Materials industry group
0.24
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- MT
- 0.24
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BHP | MT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.89 | 1.41 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.50 | 0.24 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.33 | 2.08 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
BHP (BHP) at 2.19% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.99% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, BHP the richer one.
BHP
Materials industry group
2.19%
- Max
- 4.52%
- BHP
- 2.19%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MT
Materials industry group
0.99%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- MT
- 0.99%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both BHP (BHP) at 68.84% and ArcelorMittal (MT) at 52.92% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
BHP
Materials industry group
68.84%
- Max
- 83.62%
- BHP
- 68.84%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MT
Materials industry group
52.92%
- Max
- 83.62%
- MT
- 52.92%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BHP | MT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.19% | 0.99% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 68.84% | 52.92% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
BHP (BHP) at 20.70 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 44.51 sits in the richer quartile — MT needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
BHP
Materials industry group
20.70
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- BHP
- 20.70
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
MT
Materials industry group
44.51
- Max
- 59.00
- MT
- 44.51
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.72 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while BHP (BHP) at 3.46 prices around its industry’s middle — MT costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
BHP
Materials industry group
3.46
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- BHP
- 3.46
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
MT
Materials industry group
0.72
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- MT
- 0.72
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.70 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while BHP (BHP) at 3.98 carries an above-peer premium to book — BHP is pricier on assets.
BHP
Materials industry group
3.98
- Max
- 6.59
- BHP
- 3.98
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
MT
Materials industry group
1.70
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- MT
- 1.70
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BHP | MT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 20.70 | 44.51 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.46 | 0.72 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.98 | 1.70 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.72% | -1.75% |