MT vs. RIO: ArcelorMittal vs. Rio Tinto Stock Comparison
How do ArcelorMittal (MT) and Rio Tinto (RIO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
ArcelorMittal (MT) and Rio Tinto (RIO) both belong to the Metals & Mining industry, though MT is classified under Steel while RIO falls under Diversified Metals & Mining.
Both ArcelorMittal (MT) and Rio Tinto (RIO) trade as ADRs — their core financials are comparable, but keep FX, depositary-program fees, and dividend withholding in view for each.
| Profile Item | MT | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Name | ArcelorMittal NY Registry Shares | Rio Tinto plc ADR |
| Country/Region | Luxembourg | United Kingdom |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Steel | Diversified Metals & Mining |
| Market Capitalization | 45.85 billion USD | 136.19 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | August 7, 1997 | June 28, 1990 |
| Security Type | ADR | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | MT | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 65.49% | 30.54% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 45.03% | 16.90% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 16.55% | 14.68% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
ArcelorMittal (MT) has an aggressive beta of 1.49, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Rio Tinto (RIO) is defensive at 0.63 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | MT | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 44.08% | 30.72% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.49 | 0.63 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -45.99% | -35.25% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.35M | 2.35M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | MT | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.39 | 0.85 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.23 | 1.26 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.83% and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 19.31% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
MT
Materials industry group
1.83%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- MT
- 1.83%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
RIO
Materials industry group
19.31%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- RIO
- 19.31%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Rio Tinto (RIO) at 19.59% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.64%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
MT
Materials industry group
1.64%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- MT
- 1.64%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
RIO
Materials industry group
19.59%
- Max
- 38.66%
- RIO
- 19.59%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 6.16% and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 28.05% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
MT
Materials industry group
6.16%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- MT
- 6.16%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
RIO
Materials industry group
28.05%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- RIO
- 28.05%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | MT | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 1.83% | 19.31% |
| ROA (TTM) | 1.31% | 8.11% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 1.64% | 19.59% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 6.16% | 28.05% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 8.16% | 29.75% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Rio Tinto (RIO) at 7.42% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at -1.74% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
ArcelorMittal (MT) at 143.20% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Rio Tinto (RIO) at -13.97% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for MT.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | MT | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -1.74% | 7.42% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -8.41% | 1.24% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 143.20% | -13.97% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -26.09% | -7.23% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.41 and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 1.42 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
MT
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- MT
- 1.41
- Min
- 0.16
RIO
Materials industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- RIO
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.24 and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 0.32 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
MT
Materials industry group
0.24
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- MT
- 0.24
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
RIO
Materials industry group
0.32
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- RIO
- 0.32
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | MT | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.41 | 1.42 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.24 | 0.32 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.08 | 0.58 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.99% pays an industry-typical yield; Rio Tinto (RIO) at 5.59% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
MT
Materials industry group
0.99%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- MT
- 0.99%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RIO
Materials industry group
5.59%
- RIO
- 5.59%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 52.92% and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 54.46% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
MT
Materials industry group
52.92%
- Max
- 83.62%
- MT
- 52.92%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RIO
Materials industry group
54.46%
- Max
- 83.62%
- RIO
- 54.46%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | MT | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.99% | 5.59% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 52.92% | 54.46% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Rio Tinto (RIO) at 11.35 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 44.51 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.
MT
Materials industry group
44.51
- Max
- 59.00
- MT
- 44.51
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
RIO
Materials industry group
11.35
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- RIO
- 11.35
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.72 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Rio Tinto (RIO) at 2.20 prices around its industry’s middle — MT costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
MT
Materials industry group
0.72
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- MT
- 0.72
- Min
- 0.00
RIO
Materials industry group
2.20
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- RIO
- 2.20
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.70 and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 2.08 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
MT
Materials industry group
1.70
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- MT
- 1.70
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
RIO
Materials industry group
2.08
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- RIO
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | MT | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 44.51 | 11.35 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.72 | 2.20 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.70 | 2.08 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -1.75% | 2.64% |