BHP vs. LYB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at BHP and LYB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
BHP trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, LYB is a standard domestic listing.
| Symbol | BHP | LYB |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | BHP Group Limited | LyondellBasell Industries N.V. |
| Country | Australia | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 138.87 billion USD | 17.02 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | April 28, 2010 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of BHP and LYB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | BHP | LYB |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | 4.67% | 5.50% |
| 13-Week Price Return | 5.78% | -12.77% |
| 26-Week Price Return | 3.09% | -31.92% |
| 52-Week Price Return | 6.43% | -44.71% |
| Month-to-Date Return | 6.32% | -8.63% |
| Year-to-Date Return | 5.51% | -28.73% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 6.67M | 7.00M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 8.95M | 4.59M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 23.87% | 48.45% |
| Beta | 0.89 | 0.93 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
BHP
25.21%
Metals & Mining Industry
- Max
- 31.09%
- Q3
- 16.14%
- Median
- 7.01%
- Q1
- 1.15%
- Min
- -19.85%
In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, BHP’s Return on Equity of 25.21% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
LYB
2.08%
Chemicals Industry
- Max
- 26.17%
- Q3
- 13.48%
- Median
- 8.13%
- Q1
- 2.52%
- Min
- -11.86%
LYB’s Return on Equity of 2.08% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
BHP
21.24%
Metals & Mining Industry
- Max
- 40.97%
- Q3
- 17.87%
- Median
- 7.03%
- Q1
- 1.82%
- Min
- -20.01%
A Net Profit Margin of 21.24% places BHP in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
LYB
0.75%
Chemicals Industry
- Max
- 21.80%
- Q3
- 9.57%
- Median
- 4.44%
- Q1
- 1.14%
- Min
- -11.30%
Falling into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, LYB’s Net Profit Margin of 0.75% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
BHP
40.78%
Metals & Mining Industry
- Max
- 59.48%
- Q3
- 26.06%
- Median
- 10.50%
- Q1
- 2.89%
- Min
- -21.46%
An Operating Profit Margin of 40.78% places BHP in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
LYB
1.52%
Chemicals Industry
- Max
- 27.33%
- Q3
- 13.97%
- Median
- 8.08%
- Q1
- 4.46%
- Min
- -8.10%
LYB’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.52% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | BHP | LYB |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 25.21% | 2.08% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 11.21% | 0.73% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 21.24% | 0.75% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 40.78% | 1.52% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | -- | 9.47% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
BHP
1.70
Metals & Mining Industry
- Max
- 4.81
- Q3
- 2.86
- Median
- 1.94
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.13
BHP’s Current Ratio of 1.70 aligns with the median group of the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
LYB
1.77
Chemicals Industry
- Max
- 3.38
- Q3
- 2.23
- Median
- 1.73
- Q1
- 1.39
- Min
- 0.55
LYB’s Current Ratio of 1.77 aligns with the median group of the Chemicals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
BHP
0.44
Metals & Mining Industry
- Max
- 1.11
- Q3
- 0.52
- Median
- 0.29
- Q1
- 0.12
- Min
- 0.00
BHP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.44 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
LYB
0.99
Chemicals Industry
- Max
- 1.65
- Q3
- 0.94
- Median
- 0.65
- Q1
- 0.41
- Min
- 0.00
LYB’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Chemicals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.99. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
BHP
6.06
Metals & Mining Industry
- Max
- 65.47
- Q3
- 29.91
- Median
- 5.88
- Q1
- 0.91
- Min
- -26.49
BHP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.06 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
LYB
3.85
Chemicals Industry
- Max
- 56.43
- Q3
- 26.33
- Median
- 9.38
- Q1
- 3.10
- Min
- -9.39
LYB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.85 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | BHP | LYB |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.70 | 1.77 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 1.25 | 0.92 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 6.06 | 3.85 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
BHP
5.46%
Metals & Mining Industry
- Max
- 9.36%
- Q3
- 3.78%
- Median
- 1.41%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
With a Dividend Yield of 5.46%, BHP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.
LYB
10.84%
Chemicals Industry
- Max
- 6.56%
- Q3
- 4.04%
- Median
- 2.47%
- Q1
- 1.45%
- Min
- 0.00%
LYB’s Dividend Yield of 10.84% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Chemicals industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
BHP
65.83%
Metals & Mining Industry
- Max
- 138.08%
- Q3
- 63.28%
- Median
- 38.78%
- Q1
- 12.84%
- Min
- 0.00%
BHP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 65.83% is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.
LYB
152.02%
Chemicals Industry
- Max
- 181.25%
- Q3
- 95.01%
- Median
- 53.52%
- Q1
- 26.59%
- Min
- 0.00%
LYB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 152.02% is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | BHP | LYB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 5.46% | 10.84% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 65.83% | 152.02% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
BHP
12.06
Metals & Mining Industry
- Max
- 57.44
- Q3
- 32.87
- Median
- 18.04
- Q1
- 9.84
- Min
- 0.00
BHP’s P/E Ratio of 12.06 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
LYB
61.71
Chemicals Industry
- Max
- 42.94
- Q3
- 29.77
- Median
- 20.37
- Q1
- 14.27
- Min
- 6.19
At 61.71, LYB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
BHP
2.56
Metals & Mining Industry
- Max
- 6.52
- Q3
- 3.19
- Median
- 1.97
- Q1
- 0.59
- Min
- 0.14
BHP’s P/S Ratio of 2.56 aligns with the market consensus for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
LYB
0.46
Chemicals Industry
- Max
- 4.36
- Q3
- 2.23
- Median
- 1.01
- Q1
- 0.55
- Min
- 0.16
In the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, LYB’s P/S Ratio of 0.46 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
BHP
2.89
Metals & Mining Industry
- Max
- 3.92
- Q3
- 2.15
- Median
- 1.40
- Q1
- 0.84
- Min
- 0.25
BHP’s P/B Ratio of 2.89 is in the upper tier for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
LYB
1.56
Chemicals Industry
- Max
- 4.92
- Q3
- 2.56
- Median
- 1.54
- Q1
- 0.97
- Min
- 0.30
LYB’s P/B Ratio of 1.56 is within the conventional range for the Chemicals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | BHP | LYB |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 12.06 | 61.71 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 2.56 | 0.46 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 2.89 | 1.56 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 13.25 | 6.27 |