BBD vs. MUFG: Banco Bradesco vs. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Banco Bradesco (BBD) and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) are both classified in the Diversified Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Both Banco Bradesco (BBD) and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) trade as ADRs — their core financials are comparable, but keep FX, depositary-program fees, and dividend withholding in view for each.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 14.20% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 9.46% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in returns on equity.

Both Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 27.27% and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 27.45% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Banco Bradesco (BBD) in Banks and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 11.85% and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 9.98% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 37.42% and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 33.15% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Banco Bradesco (BBD) in Banks and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Banco Bradesco (BBD) in Banks and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 53.03% and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 406.81% yield above their industries’ entire benchmark ranges — high enough that dividend safety, not income, becomes the first question.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 34.74% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 53.52% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 5.64 trades below its industry P/E ratio range, while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 13.71 is closer to a normal peer multiple — a clearer earnings-valuation discount for BBD, subject to growth and earnings quality.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Banco Bradesco (BBD) in Banks and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 0.69 looks cheap against book in the lower P/B ratio quartile, while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 1.64 carries a premium in the upper quartile — a clear price-to-book gap.

Valuation Metrics