Seek Returns

BA vs. PH: Boeing vs. Parker-Hannifin Stock Comparison

How do Boeing (BA) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Boeing (BA) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but BA is classified in Aerospace & Defense while PH is classified in Machinery.

Company profile comparison for Boeing (BA) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Profile ItemBAPH
NameThe Boeing CompanyParker-Hannifin Corporation
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCapital GoodsCapital Goods
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseMachinery
GICS Sub-IndustryAerospace & DefenseIndustrial Machinery & Supplies & Components
Market Capitalization137.41 billion USD115.73 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

BA
PH
GSPC
Loading price history…
Boeing (BA) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Boeing (BA) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Boeing (BA) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Boeing (BA) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricBAPH
Total Return (1Y)-10.22%14.13%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)-3.32%33.71%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)-4.57%25.35%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

BA
PH
GSPC
Loading price history…
Boeing (BA) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Boeing (BA) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Boeing (BA) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricBAPH
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)35.25%27.33%
Beta (5Y)1.311.12
Max Drawdown (5Y)-50.29%-28.64%
Avg. Volume (3M)7.77M627.57K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
BA and PH are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Boeing (BA) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricBAPH
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.410.36
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.600.53

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Parker-Hannifin (PH) earns 24.95% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Boeing (BA) has no ROE this period.

BA

Capital Goods industry group

--

Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%
BA
--

PH

Capital Goods industry group

24.95%

Max
40.55%
PH
24.95%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%
Loading chart…
Boeing (BA) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): BA does not report ROE, so it has no value marker; PH is benchmarked against the Capital Goods industry group.

Net Margin (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 16.62% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Boeing (BA) at 8.07%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

BA

Capital Goods industry group

8.07%

Max
27.47%
Q3
12.10%
BA
8.07%
Median
6.30%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

16.62%

Max
27.47%
PH
16.62%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%
Loading chart…
Boeing (BA) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 21.90% carries a top-quartile operating margin, while Boeing (BA) at 0.30% operates in the bottom quartile.

BA

Capital Goods industry group

0.30%

Max
36.60%
Q3
18.33%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
BA
0.30%
Min
-12.63%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

21.90%

Max
36.60%
PH
21.90%
Q3
18.33%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%
Loading chart…
Boeing (BA) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Boeing (BA) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricBAPH
ROE (TTM)--24.95%
ROA (TTM)-0.11%8.56%
Net Margin (TTM)8.07%16.62%
Operating Margin (TTM)0.30%21.90%
Gross Margin (TTM)9.45%37.70%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Boeing (BA) at 34.50% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 8.31% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for BA.

Loading chart…
Boeing (BA) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Only one side can be read here: Parker-Hannifin (PH) reports EPS growth of 5.01%, ranked against its industry; Boeing (BA) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Loading chart…
Boeing (BA) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Boeing (BA) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricBAPH
Revenue Growth (YoY)34.50%8.31%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)10.33%4.09%
EPS Growth (YoY)--5.01%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)--21.09%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Boeing (BA) at 1.13 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.94 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

BA

Capital Goods industry group

1.13

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
BA
1.13
Min
0.36

PH

Capital Goods industry group

0.94

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
PH
0.94
Min
0.36
Loading chart…
Boeing (BA) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 1.09 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Boeing (BA) at 7.39 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.

BA

Capital Goods industry group

7.39

BA
7.39
Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

PH

Capital Goods industry group

1.09

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
PH
1.09
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Boeing (BA) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Boeing (BA) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricBAPH
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.130.94
Debt / Equity (MRQ)7.391.09
Net Debt / EBITDA13.812.81

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Boeing (BA) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Parker-Hannifin (PH) reports a yield of 0.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.

BA

Capital Goods industry group

0.00%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
Median
0.24%
BA
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

0.85%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
PH
0.85%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Boeing (BA) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Boeing (BA) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Parker-Hannifin (PH) reports a payout of 26.11%, ranking against industry peers normally.

BA

Capital Goods industry group

0.00%

Max
67.39%
Q3
28.02%
Median
6.86%
BA
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

26.11%

Max
67.39%
Q3
28.02%
PH
26.11%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Boeing (BA) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Boeing (BA) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricBAPH
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.85%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%26.11%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Boeing (BA) at 17.89 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 31.53 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for BA, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

BA

Capital Goods industry group

17.89

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
BA
17.89
Min
3.03

PH

Capital Goods industry group

31.53

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
PH
31.53
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03
Loading chart…
Boeing (BA) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Boeing (BA) at 1.45 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.16 sits in the pricier quartile — PH costs more per dollar of sales.

BA

Capital Goods industry group

1.45

Max
7.54
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
BA
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03

PH

Capital Goods industry group

5.16

Max
7.54
PH
5.16
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03
Loading chart…
Boeing (BA) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both look rich against book: Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 7.25 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Boeing (BA) at 20.99 prices even higher, above its industry range.

BA

Capital Goods industry group

20.99

BA
20.99
Max
9.66
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08

PH

Capital Goods industry group

7.25

Max
9.66
PH
7.25
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08
Loading chart…
Boeing (BA) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Boeing (BA) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricBAPH
P/E Ratio (TTM)17.8931.53
P/S Ratio (TTM)1.455.16
P/B Ratio (MRQ)20.997.25
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)3.44%2.45%