PH vs. RTX: Parker-Hannifin vs. RTX Stock Comparison
How do Parker-Hannifin (PH) and RTX (RTX) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Parker-Hannifin (PH) and RTX (RTX) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but PH is classified in Machinery while RTX is classified in Aerospace & Defense.
| Profile Item | PH | RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Parker-Hannifin Corporation | RTX Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 115.73 billion USD | 255.76 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | April 2, 1962 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | PH | RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 14.13% | 12.51% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 33.71% | 36.20% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 25.35% | 19.14% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | PH | RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 27.33% | 25.84% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 0.30 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -28.64% | -32.84% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 627.57K | 4.59M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | PH | RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.36 | 0.32 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.53 | 0.48 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 24.95% sits in the top ROE quartile, while RTX (RTX) at 12.85% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PH.
PH
Capital Goods industry group
24.95%
- Max
- 40.55%
- PH
- 24.95%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
RTX
Capital Goods industry group
12.85%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- RTX
- 12.85%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 16.62% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of RTX (RTX) at 8.75%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
PH
Capital Goods industry group
16.62%
- Max
- 27.47%
- PH
- 16.62%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
RTX
Capital Goods industry group
8.75%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- RTX
- 8.75%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 21.90% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of RTX (RTX) at 15.54%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
PH
Capital Goods industry group
21.90%
- Max
- 36.60%
- PH
- 21.90%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
RTX
Capital Goods industry group
15.54%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- RTX
- 15.54%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | PH | RTX |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 24.95% | 12.85% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.56% | 4.56% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 16.62% | 8.75% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 21.90% | 15.54% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 37.70% | 21.10% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 8.31% and RTX (RTX) at 9.74% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
RTX (RTX) at 39.72% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.01% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for RTX.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | PH | RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 8.31% | 9.74% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 4.09% | 9.72% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 5.01% | 39.72% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 21.09% | 12.32% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.94 and RTX (RTX) at 1.05 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
PH
Capital Goods industry group
0.94
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- PH
- 0.94
- Min
- 0.36
RTX
Capital Goods industry group
1.05
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- RTX
- 1.05
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 1.09 and RTX (RTX) at 0.55 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
PH
Capital Goods industry group
1.09
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- PH
- 1.09
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
RTX
Capital Goods industry group
0.55
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- RTX
- 0.55
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | PH | RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.94 | 1.05 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.09 | 0.55 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.81 | 1.75 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
RTX (RTX) at 1.47% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.85% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, RTX the richer one.
PH
Capital Goods industry group
0.85%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- PH
- 0.85%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RTX
Capital Goods industry group
1.47%
- Max
- 2.66%
- RTX
- 1.47%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 26.11% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while RTX (RTX) at 45.85% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
PH
Capital Goods industry group
26.11%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- PH
- 26.11%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RTX
Capital Goods industry group
45.85%
- Max
- 67.39%
- RTX
- 45.85%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | PH | RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.85% | 1.47% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 26.11% | 45.85% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 31.53 and RTX (RTX) at 30.82 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
PH
Capital Goods industry group
31.53
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- PH
- 31.53
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
RTX
Capital Goods industry group
30.82
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- RTX
- 30.82
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
RTX (RTX) at 2.66 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.16 sits in the pricier quartile — PH costs more per dollar of sales.
PH
Capital Goods industry group
5.16
- Max
- 7.54
- PH
- 5.16
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
RTX
Capital Goods industry group
2.66
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- RTX
- 2.66
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
RTX (RTX) at 3.69 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 7.25 carries an above-peer premium to book — PH is pricier on assets.
PH
Capital Goods industry group
7.25
- Max
- 9.66
- PH
- 7.25
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
RTX
Capital Goods industry group
3.69
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- RTX
- 3.69
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | PH | RTX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 31.53 | 30.82 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 5.16 | 2.66 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 7.25 | 3.69 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.45% | 3.25% |