Seek Returns logo

TRI vs. ULS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TRI and ULS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTRIULS
Company NameThomson Reuters CorporationUL Solutions Inc.
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesProfessional Services
Market Capitalization78.82 billion USD12.70 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 12, 2002April 12, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TRI and ULS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TRI vs. ULS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTRIULS
5-Day Price Return-0.67%-3.07%
13-Week Price Return-10.08%-12.71%
26-Week Price Return-3.26%19.22%
52-Week Price Return7.33%14.89%
Month-to-Date Return-12.92%-13.57%
Year-to-Date Return4.91%26.70%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.49M0.82M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.37M0.89M
3-Month Volatility29.79%35.42%
Beta0.510.52

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TRI

13.40%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

TRI’s Return on Equity of 13.40% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ULS

34.07%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

In the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, ULS’s Return on Equity of 34.07% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TRI vs. ULS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Professional Services industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TRI

22.34%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.34% places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ULS

11.08%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

ULS’s Net Profit Margin of 11.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TRI vs. ULS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Professional Services industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TRI

29.19%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.19% places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ULS

16.71%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

ULS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.71% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TRI vs. ULS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Professional Services industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTRIULS
Return on Equity (TTM)13.40%34.07%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.92%11.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)22.34%11.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.19%16.71%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)95.36%48.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TRI

0.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

TRI’s Current Ratio of 0.79 falls into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ULS

1.32

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

ULS’s Current Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TRI vs. ULS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Professional Services industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TRI

0.17

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, TRI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ULS

0.56

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

ULS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TRI vs. ULS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Professional Services industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TRI

17.23

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

TRI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.23 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ULS

11.92

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

ULS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TRI vs. ULS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Professional Services industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTRIULS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.791.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.641.32
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.170.56
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)17.2311.92

Growth

Revenue Growth

TRI vs. ULS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TRI vs. ULS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TRI

1.26%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

TRI’s Dividend Yield of 1.26% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ULS

0.76%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

ULS’s Dividend Yield of 0.76% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TRI vs. ULS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Professional Services industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TRI

60.86%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

TRI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 60.86% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ULS

31.19%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

ULS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.19% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TRI vs. ULS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Professional Services industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTRIULS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.26%0.76%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)60.86%31.19%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TRI

48.19

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

A P/E Ratio of 48.19 places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ULS

41.10

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

A P/E Ratio of 41.10 places ULS in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TRI vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Professional Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TRI

10.77

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 10.77, TRI trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ULS

4.55

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

ULS’s P/S Ratio of 4.55 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TRI vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Professional Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TRI

7.05

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

TRI’s P/B Ratio of 7.05 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ULS

13.37

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

ULS’s P/B Ratio of 13.37 is in the upper tier for the Professional Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TRI vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Professional Services industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTRIULS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)48.1941.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)10.774.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.0513.37
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)41.7536.92