Seek Returns logo

CTAS vs. ULS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CTAS and ULS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCTASULS
Company NameCintas CorporationUL Solutions Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesProfessional Services
Market Capitalization90.71 billion USD14.13 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateAugust 19, 1983April 12, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CTAS and ULS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CTAS vs. ULS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCTASULS
5-Day Price Return0.76%6.64%
13-Week Price Return3.74%0.00%
26-Week Price Return10.19%29.30%
52-Week Price Return18.53%40.59%
Month-to-Date Return1.15%-3.79%
Year-to-Date Return23.21%41.04%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.34M1.48M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.61M0.96M
3-Month Volatility17.15%33.65%
Beta1.020.55

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CTAS

41.21%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

CTAS’s Return on Equity of 41.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ULS

38.35%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

In the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, ULS’s Return on Equity of 38.35% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CTAS vs. ULS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CTAS

17.53%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.53% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ULS

11.60%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

ULS’s Net Profit Margin of 11.60% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CTAS vs. ULS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CTAS

22.82%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.82% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ULS

16.52%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

ULS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.52% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CTAS vs. ULS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCTASULS
Return on Equity (TTM)41.21%38.35%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.14%11.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.53%11.60%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.82%16.52%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.04%48.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

2.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

CTAS’s Current Ratio of 2.09 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ULS

1.24

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

ULS’s Current Ratio of 1.24 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CTAS vs. ULS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

0.52

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

CTAS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.52 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ULS

0.67

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

ULS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CTAS vs. ULS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

24.70

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

CTAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 24.70 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ULS

11.92

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

ULS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CTAS vs. ULS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCTASULS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.091.24
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.711.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.520.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)24.7011.92

Growth

Revenue Growth

CTAS vs. ULS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CTAS vs. ULS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CTAS

0.68%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Yield of 0.68% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ULS

0.71%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

ULS’s Dividend Yield of 0.71% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CTAS vs. ULS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

33.75%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.75% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ULS

29.97%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

ULS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.97% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CTAS vs. ULS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCTASULS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.68%0.71%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.75%29.97%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

49.83

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 49.83 places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ULS

41.94

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

A P/E Ratio of 41.94 places ULS in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CTAS vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

8.73

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 8.73, CTAS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ULS

4.86

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

ULS’s P/S Ratio of 4.86 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CTAS vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

19.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

At 19.50, CTAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ULS

11.64

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

ULS’s P/B Ratio of 11.64 is in the upper tier for the Professional Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CTAS vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCTASULS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)49.8341.94
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.734.86
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)19.5011.64
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)51.3946.18