Seek Returns logo

CTAS vs. ULS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CTAS and ULS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCTASULS
Company NameCintas CorporationUL Solutions Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesProfessional Services
Market Capitalization80.20 billion USD14.83 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateAugust 19, 1983April 12, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CTAS and ULS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CTAS vs. ULS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCTASULS
5-Day Price Return-3.03%4.16%
13-Week Price Return-8.50%0.99%
26-Week Price Return-4.25%27.59%
52-Week Price Return-2.69%48.03%
Month-to-Date Return-3.03%4.16%
Year-to-Date Return8.94%47.98%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.00M0.64M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.69M0.79M
3-Month Volatility16.81%35.48%
Beta0.990.44

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CTAS

41.21%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

CTAS’s Return on Equity of 41.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ULS

34.07%

Professional Services Industry

Max
68.01%
Q3
35.32%
Median
21.92%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-20.25%

ULS’s Return on Equity of 34.07% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CTAS vs. ULS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CTAS

17.53%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

CTAS’s Net Profit Margin of 17.53% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ULS

11.08%

Professional Services Industry

Max
31.75%
Q3
15.50%
Median
8.95%
Q1
4.51%
Min
0.35%

ULS’s Net Profit Margin of 11.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CTAS vs. ULS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CTAS

22.82%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.82% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ULS

16.71%

Professional Services Industry

Max
30.62%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.60%
Q1
8.60%
Min
-2.18%

ULS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.71% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CTAS vs. ULS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCTASULS
Return on Equity (TTM)41.21%34.07%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.14%11.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.53%11.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.82%16.71%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.04%48.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

2.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

CTAS’s Current Ratio of 2.09 aligns with the median group of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ULS

1.32

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.75
Median
1.34
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

ULS’s Current Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CTAS vs. ULS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

0.52

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

CTAS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.52 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ULS

0.56

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.45
Median
0.98
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

ULS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CTAS vs. ULS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

24.70

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

CTAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 24.70 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ULS

11.92

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.41
Median
11.64
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

ULS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CTAS vs. ULS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCTASULS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.091.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.711.32
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.520.56
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)24.7011.92

Growth

Revenue Growth

CTAS vs. ULS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CTAS vs. ULS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CTAS

0.76%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Yield of 0.76% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ULS

0.69%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.52%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

ULS’s Dividend Yield of 0.69% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CTAS vs. ULS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

33.75%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.75% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ULS

31.19%

Professional Services Industry

Max
128.51%
Q3
69.03%
Median
47.00%
Q1
18.05%
Min
0.00%

ULS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.19% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CTAS vs. ULS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCTASULS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.76%0.69%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.75%31.19%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

44.55

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

A P/E Ratio of 44.55 places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ULS

45.34

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.60
Q3
33.83
Median
24.95
Q1
17.59
Min
7.96

A P/E Ratio of 45.34 places ULS in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CTAS vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CTAS

7.81

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

With a P/S Ratio of 7.81, CTAS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ULS

5.02

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.27
Q3
4.40
Median
2.09
Q1
0.99
Min
0.17

ULS’s P/S Ratio of 5.02 is in the upper echelon for the Professional Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CTAS vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CTAS

19.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

At 19.50, CTAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ULS

13.37

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.75
Q3
9.53
Median
5.88
Q1
2.95
Min
0.59

ULS’s P/B Ratio of 13.37 is in the upper tier for the Professional Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CTAS vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCTASULS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)44.5545.34
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.815.02
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)19.5013.37
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)45.9540.73