Seek Returns

CTAS vs. TRI: Cintas vs. Thomson Reuters Stock Comparison

How do Cintas (CTAS) and Thomson Reuters (TRI) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Cintas (CTAS) and Thomson Reuters (TRI) both fall under the Commercial & Professional Services industry group, but CTAS is classified in Commercial Services & Supplies while TRI is classified in Professional Services.

Company profile comparison for Cintas (CTAS) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
Profile ItemCTASTRI
NameCintas CorporationThomson Reuters Corp.
Country/RegionUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCommercial & Professional ServicesCommercial & Professional Services
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesProfessional Services
GICS Sub-IndustryDiversified Support ServicesResearch & Consulting Services
Market Capitalization80.19 billion USD39.59 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNasdaq
Listing DateAugust 19, 1983June 12, 2002
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CTAS
TRI
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Cintas (CTAS) and Thomson Reuters (TRI). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Cintas (CTAS) and Thomson Reuters (TRI). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Cintas (CTAS) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricCTASTRI
Total Return (1Y)-8.59%-53.68%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)17.50%-9.73%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)16.45%-0.75%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CTAS
TRI
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Cintas (CTAS) and Thomson Reuters (TRI). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Cintas (CTAS) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricCTASTRI
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)22.68%44.48%
Beta (5Y)0.920.78
Max Drawdown (5Y)-27.68%-62.87%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.22M2.05M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CTAS and TRI are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Cintas (CTAS) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricCTASTRI
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.56-1.30
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.80-1.72

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Cintas (CTAS) at 40.71% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 12.73% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CTAS.

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

40.71%

Max
53.04%
CTAS
40.71%
Q3
25.65%
Median
13.99%
Q1
2.99%
Min
-28.46%

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

12.73%

Max
53.04%
Q3
25.65%
Median
13.99%
TRI
12.73%
Q1
2.99%
Min
-28.46%
Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their ROE against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

For every dollar of sales, both Cintas (CTAS) at 17.75% and Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 19.93% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

17.75%

Max
26.63%
CTAS
17.75%
Q3
11.56%
Median
6.26%
Q1
1.30%
Min
-13.15%

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

19.93%

Max
26.63%
TRI
19.93%
Q3
11.56%
Median
6.26%
Q1
1.30%
Min
-13.15%
Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their net margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Cintas (CTAS) at 23.65% and Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 30.33% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

23.65%

Max
38.33%
CTAS
23.65%
Q3
17.67%
Median
9.37%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-4.52%

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

30.33%

Max
38.33%
TRI
30.33%
Q3
17.67%
Median
9.37%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-4.52%
Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their operating margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Cintas (CTAS) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricCTASTRI
ROE (TTM)40.71%12.73%
ROA (TTM)16.10%6.94%
Net Margin (TTM)17.75%19.93%
Operating Margin (TTM)23.65%30.33%
Gross Margin (TTM)50.67%39.46%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Only one side can be read here: Thomson Reuters (TRI) reports revenue growth of 3.00%, ranked against its industry; Cintas (CTAS) has no revenue growth figure this period.

Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Cintas (CTAS) at 11.59% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Thomson Reuters (TRI) at -31.90% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Cintas (CTAS) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricCTASTRI
Revenue Growth (YoY)--3.00%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)--4.10%
EPS Growth (YoY)11.59%-31.90%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)14.77%3.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Cintas (CTAS) at 1.43 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 0.60 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for TRI.

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.43

Max
3.17
Q3
2.01
Median
1.48
CTAS
1.43
Q1
1.13
Min
0.45

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.60

Max
3.17
Q3
2.01
Median
1.48
Q1
1.13
TRI
0.60
Min
0.45
Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their current ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 0.23 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Cintas (CTAS) at 0.53 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.53

Max
2.61
Q3
1.39
Median
0.94
CTAS
0.53
Q1
0.40
Min
0.01

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.23

Max
2.61
Q3
1.39
Median
0.94
Q1
0.40
TRI
0.23
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Cintas (CTAS) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricCTASTRI
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.430.60
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.530.23
Net Debt / EBITDA0.771.02

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 2.60% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Cintas (CTAS) at 0.89% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, TRI the richer one.

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.89%

Max
3.77%
Q3
1.82%
CTAS
0.89%
Median
0.44%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.60%

Max
3.77%
TRI
2.60%
Q3
1.82%
Median
0.44%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Cintas (CTAS) at 36.66% and Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 71.35% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

36.66%

Max
90.59%
CTAS
36.66%
Q3
36.56%
Median
16.11%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

71.35%

Max
90.59%
TRI
71.35%
Q3
36.56%
Median
16.11%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Cintas (CTAS) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricCTASTRI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.89%2.60%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)36.66%71.35%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 27.48 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Cintas (CTAS) at 41.15 sits in the richer quartile — CTAS needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

41.15

Max
67.06
CTAS
41.15
Q3
38.84
Median
23.07
Q1
16.03
Min
4.96

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

27.48

Max
67.06
Q3
38.84
TRI
27.48
Median
23.07
Q1
16.03
Min
4.96
Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Both Cintas (CTAS) at 7.12 and Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 5.17 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

7.12

Max
7.33
CTAS
7.12
Q3
3.42
Median
1.37
Q1
0.74
Min
0.13

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

5.17

Max
7.33
TRI
5.17
Q3
3.42
Median
1.37
Q1
0.74
Min
0.13
Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 3.35 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Cintas (CTAS) at 15.60 prices above its benchmark range — CTAS looks rich relative to book.

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

15.60

CTAS
15.60
Max
10.74
Q3
5.92
Median
3.25
Q1
1.95
Min
-2.86

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

3.35

Max
10.74
Q3
5.92
TRI
3.35
Median
3.25
Q1
1.95
Min
-2.86
Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Cintas (CTAS) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricCTASTRI
P/E Ratio (TTM)41.1527.48
P/S Ratio (TTM)7.125.17
P/B Ratio (MRQ)15.603.35
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)1.83%4.24%