SHW vs. VALE: Sherwin-Williams vs. Vale Stock Comparison
How do Sherwin-Williams (SHW) and Vale (VALE) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) and Vale (VALE) both fall under the Materials industry group, but SHW is classified in Chemicals while VALE is classified in Metals & Mining.
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) trades as ordinary local shares, while Vale (VALE) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | SHW | VALE |
|---|---|---|
| Name | The Sherwin-Williams Company | Vale S.A. American Depositary Shares |
| Country/Region | United States | Brazil |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Chemicals | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Specialty Chemicals | Steel |
| Market Capitalization | 83.13 billion USD | 49.32 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | March 21, 2002 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | SHW | VALE |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 5.74% | 6.20% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 13.18% | 3.12% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 2.84% | 8.31% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | SHW | VALE |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 29.59% | 33.88% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.02 | 0.48 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -42.46% | -49.81% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.72M | 32.62M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | SHW | VALE |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.05 | 0.06 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.08 | 0.08 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 63.70% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Vale (VALE) at 0.26%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
SHW
Materials industry group
63.70%
- SHW
- 63.70%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
VALE
Materials industry group
0.26%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- VALE
- 0.26%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 10.74% and Vale (VALE) at 1.01% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
SHW
Materials industry group
10.74%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- SHW
- 10.74%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
VALE
Materials industry group
1.01%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- VALE
- 1.01%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 17.56% and Vale (VALE) at 19.31% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
SHW
Materials industry group
17.56%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- SHW
- 17.56%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
VALE
Materials industry group
19.31%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- VALE
- 19.31%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | SHW | VALE |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 63.70% | 0.26% |
| ROA (TTM) | 9.48% | 6.97% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.74% | 1.01% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 17.56% | 19.31% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 48.60% | 32.06% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 2.06% and Vale (VALE) at 0.91% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at -2.75% and Vale (VALE) at -61.81% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | SHW | VALE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 2.06% | 0.91% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 2.10% | -4.32% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -2.75% | -61.81% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.95% | -48.60% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.71 and Vale (VALE) at 1.10 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
SHW
Materials industry group
0.71
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- SHW
- 0.71
- Min
- 0.16
VALE
Materials industry group
1.10
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- VALE
- 1.10
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Vale (VALE) at 0.55 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.72 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
SHW
Materials industry group
3.72
- SHW
- 3.72
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
VALE
Materials industry group
0.55
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- VALE
- 0.55
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | SHW | VALE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.71 | 1.10 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 3.72 | 0.55 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.04 | 1.20 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.91% pays an industry-typical yield; Vale (VALE) at 49.02% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
SHW
Materials industry group
0.91%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- SHW
- 0.91%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VALE
Materials industry group
49.02%
- VALE
- 49.02%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Vale (VALE) reports payout ratio above 100% at 526.96%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Sherwin-Williams (SHW) reports 29.35%, ranking against industry peers normally.
SHW
Materials industry group
29.35%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- SHW
- 29.35%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VALE
Materials industry group
526.96%
- VALE
- 526.96%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | SHW | VALE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.91% | 49.02% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 29.35% | 526.96% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 31.66 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Vale (VALE) at 72.44 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for VALE’s trailing earnings.
SHW
Materials industry group
31.66
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- SHW
- 31.66
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
VALE
Materials industry group
72.44
- VALE
- 72.44
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Vale (VALE) at 0.23 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.34 prices around its industry’s middle — VALE costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
SHW
Materials industry group
3.34
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- SHW
- 3.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
VALE
Materials industry group
0.23
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- VALE
- 0.23
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Vale (VALE) at 1.27 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 20.78 prices above its benchmark range — SHW looks rich relative to book.
SHW
Materials industry group
20.78
- SHW
- 20.78
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
VALE
Materials industry group
1.27
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- VALE
- 1.27
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SHW | VALE |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 31.66 | 72.44 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.34 | 0.23 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 20.78 | 1.27 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.98% | 17.51% |