RPM vs. SHW: RPM vs. Sherwin-Williams Stock Comparison
How do RPM (RPM) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
RPM (RPM) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) are both classified in the Specialty Chemicals sub-industry within the broader Chemicals industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | RPM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | RPM International Inc. | The Sherwin-Williams Company |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Chemicals | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Specialty Chemicals | Specialty Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 13.18 billion USD | 83.13 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | RPM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 1.43% | 5.74% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 5.53% | 13.18% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 5.33% | 2.84% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | RPM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 31.14% | 29.59% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.00 | 1.02 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -31.97% | -42.46% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.29M | 1.72M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | RPM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.09 | 0.05 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.15 | 0.08 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 63.70% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; RPM (RPM) at 21.15% also sits in the top quartile.
RPM
Materials industry group
21.15%
- Max
- 52.88%
- RPM
- 21.15%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
SHW
Materials industry group
63.70%
- SHW
- 63.70%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both RPM (RPM) at 8.66% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 10.74% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
RPM
Materials industry group
8.66%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- RPM
- 8.66%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
SHW
Materials industry group
10.74%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- SHW
- 10.74%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both RPM (RPM) at 16.20% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 17.56% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
RPM
Materials industry group
16.20%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- RPM
- 16.20%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
SHW
Materials industry group
17.56%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- SHW
- 17.56%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | RPM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 21.15% | 63.70% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.88% | 9.48% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.66% | 10.74% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 16.20% | 17.56% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 41.17% | 48.60% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both RPM (RPM) at 6.66% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 2.06% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both RPM (RPM) at -3.36% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at -2.75% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | RPM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 6.66% | 2.06% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 2.71% | 2.10% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -3.36% | -2.75% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 11.60% | 9.95% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
RPM (RPM) at 1.76 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.71 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for SHW.
RPM
Materials industry group
1.76
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- RPM
- 1.76
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
SHW
Materials industry group
0.71
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- SHW
- 0.71
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
RPM (RPM) at 0.79 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.72 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
RPM
Materials industry group
0.79
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- RPM
- 0.79
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.72
- SHW
- 3.72
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | RPM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.76 | 0.71 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.79 | 3.72 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.97 | 3.04 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
RPM (RPM) at 2.05% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.91% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, RPM the richer one.
RPM
Materials industry group
2.05%
- Max
- 4.52%
- RPM
- 2.05%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
0.91%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- SHW
- 0.91%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both RPM (RPM) at 39.93% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 29.35% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
RPM
Materials industry group
39.93%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- RPM
- 39.93%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
29.35%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- SHW
- 29.35%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | RPM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.05% | 0.91% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 39.93% | 29.35% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both RPM (RPM) at 19.10 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 31.66 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
RPM
Materials industry group
19.10
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- RPM
- 19.10
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
SHW
Materials industry group
31.66
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- SHW
- 31.66
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both RPM (RPM) at 1.65 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.34 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
RPM
Materials industry group
1.65
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- RPM
- 1.65
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.34
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- SHW
- 3.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: RPM (RPM) at 3.79 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 20.78 prices even higher, above its industry range.
RPM
Materials industry group
3.79
- Max
- 6.59
- RPM
- 3.79
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
SHW
Materials industry group
20.78
- SHW
- 20.78
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | RPM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 19.10 | 31.66 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.65 | 3.34 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.79 | 20.78 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.20% | 2.98% |