Seek Returns logo

RL vs. TOL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at RL and TOL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolRLTOL
Company NameRalph Lauren CorporationToll Brothers, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization19.93 billion USD12.74 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 12, 1997July 8, 1986
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of RL and TOL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

RL vs. TOL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolRLTOL
5-Day Price Return2.06%-5.30%
13-Week Price Return13.24%8.86%
26-Week Price Return66.27%34.31%
52-Week Price Return68.26%-12.19%
Month-to-Date Return4.93%-4.34%
Year-to-Date Return42.45%4.92%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.55M1.10M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.66M1.64M
3-Month Volatility28.36%35.13%
Beta1.571.43

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

RL

31.52%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
42.05%
Q3
24.41%
Median
17.18%
Q1
7.87%
Min
-8.23%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, RL’s Return on Equity of 31.52% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TOL

17.46%

Household Durables Industry

Max
27.70%
Q3
17.40%
Median
12.87%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-5.50%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, TOL’s Return on Equity of 17.46% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

RL vs. TOL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

RL

10.91%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
6.06%
Q1
3.93%
Min
-3.05%

RL’s Net Profit Margin of 10.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TOL

12.64%

Household Durables Industry

Max
16.37%
Q3
9.18%
Median
6.63%
Q1
3.85%
Min
-3.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.64% places TOL in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RL vs. TOL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

RL

13.69%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
11.68%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.12%

RL’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.69% is around the midpoint for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TOL

16.25%

Household Durables Industry

Max
21.32%
Q3
12.25%
Median
9.93%
Q1
5.57%
Min
-1.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.25% places TOL in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RL vs. TOL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolRLTOL
Return on Equity (TTM)31.52%17.46%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.08%9.90%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.91%12.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.69%16.25%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)69.03%25.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

RL

1.84

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.22
Median
1.61
Q1
1.48
Min
0.74

RL’s Current Ratio of 1.84 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TOL

3.72

Household Durables Industry

Max
6.09
Q3
3.79
Median
2.54
Q1
1.23
Min
0.83

TOL’s Current Ratio of 3.72 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RL vs. TOL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

RL

0.75

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.32
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

RL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.75 is typical for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TOL

0.36

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.87
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

TOL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RL vs. TOL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

RL

85.38

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
32.83
Median
7.87
Q1
3.52
Min
-32.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 85.38, RL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

TOL

-8.67

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

TOL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -8.67. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

RL vs. TOL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolRLTOL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.843.72
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.250.34
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.750.36
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)85.38-8.67

Growth

Revenue Growth

RL vs. TOL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

RL vs. TOL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

RL

1.03%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.22%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.34%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

RL’s Dividend Yield of 1.03% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

TOL

0.77%

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.61%
Q3
3.97%
Median
2.00%
Q1
0.18%
Min
0.00%

TOL’s Dividend Yield of 0.77% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RL vs. TOL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

RL

25.71%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
94.60%
Median
52.65%
Q1
35.04%
Min
0.00%

RL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.71% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

TOL

7.01%

Household Durables Industry

Max
129.55%
Q3
65.55%
Median
42.15%
Q1
6.45%
Min
0.00%

TOL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 7.01% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RL vs. TOL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolRLTOL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.03%0.77%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)25.71%7.01%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

RL

25.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
48.15
Q3
33.82
Median
20.70
Q1
14.57
Min
7.12

RL’s P/E Ratio of 25.00 is within the middle range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TOL

9.15

Household Durables Industry

Max
33.67
Q3
19.33
Median
12.58
Q1
9.62
Min
6.48

In the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, TOL’s P/E Ratio of 9.15 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

RL vs. TOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

RL

2.73

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.35
Q3
3.06
Median
1.66
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

RL’s P/S Ratio of 2.73 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TOL

1.16

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.39
Median
0.90
Q1
0.54
Min
0.19

TOL’s P/S Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RL vs. TOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

RL

6.61

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.74
Q3
5.59
Median
3.41
Q1
2.01
Min
0.56

RL’s P/B Ratio of 6.61 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TOL

1.41

Household Durables Industry

Max
3.26
Q3
2.01
Median
1.38
Q1
1.00
Min
0.58

TOL’s P/B Ratio of 1.41 is within the conventional range for the Household Durables industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RL vs. TOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolRLTOL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)25.009.15
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.731.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.611.41
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.509.28