RIO vs. STLD: Rio Tinto vs. Steel Dynamics Stock Comparison
How do Rio Tinto (RIO) and Steel Dynamics (STLD) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Rio Tinto (RIO) and Steel Dynamics (STLD) both belong to the Metals & Mining industry, though RIO is classified under Diversified Metals & Mining while STLD falls under Steel.
Steel Dynamics (STLD) trades as ordinary local shares, while Rio Tinto (RIO) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | RIO | STLD |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Rio Tinto plc ADR | Steel Dynamics, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United Kingdom | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Diversified Metals & Mining | Steel |
| Market Capitalization | 136.19 billion USD | 31.70 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | June 28, 1990 | November 22, 1996 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | RIO | STLD |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 30.54% | 52.02% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 16.90% | 29.83% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 14.68% | 30.20% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Steel Dynamics (STLD) has an aggressive beta of 1.46, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Rio Tinto (RIO) is defensive at 0.63 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | RIO | STLD |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 30.72% | 36.62% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.63 | 1.46 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -35.25% | -32.20% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.35M | 1.06M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | RIO | STLD |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.85 | 1.30 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.26 | 1.92 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Steel Dynamics (STLD) at 20.81% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Rio Tinto (RIO) at 19.31% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for STLD.
RIO
Materials industry group
19.31%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- RIO
- 19.31%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
STLD
Materials industry group
20.81%
- Max
- 52.88%
- STLD
- 20.81%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Rio Tinto (RIO) at 19.59% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Steel Dynamics (STLD) at 8.82%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
RIO
Materials industry group
19.59%
- Max
- 38.66%
- RIO
- 19.59%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
STLD
Materials industry group
8.82%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- STLD
- 8.82%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Rio Tinto (RIO) at 28.05% and Steel Dynamics (STLD) at 15.46% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
RIO
Materials industry group
28.05%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- RIO
- 28.05%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
STLD
Materials industry group
15.46%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- STLD
- 15.46%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | RIO | STLD |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 19.31% | 20.81% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.11% | 9.45% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 19.59% | 8.82% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 28.05% | 15.46% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 29.75% | 15.90% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Rio Tinto (RIO) at 7.42% and Steel Dynamics (STLD) at 3.63% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Rio Tinto (RIO) at -13.97% and Steel Dynamics (STLD) at -18.80% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | RIO | STLD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.42% | 3.63% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 1.24% | -6.53% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -13.97% | -18.80% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -7.23% | -27.45% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Steel Dynamics (STLD) at 3.15 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Rio Tinto (RIO) at 1.42 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for RIO.
RIO
Materials industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- RIO
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.16
STLD
Materials industry group
3.15
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- STLD
- 3.15
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Rio Tinto (RIO) at 0.32 and Steel Dynamics (STLD) at 0.45 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
RIO
Materials industry group
0.32
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- RIO
- 0.32
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
STLD
Materials industry group
0.45
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- STLD
- 0.45
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | RIO | STLD |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.42 | 3.15 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.32 | 0.45 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.58 | 1.09 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Steel Dynamics (STLD) at 0.94% pays an industry-typical yield; Rio Tinto (RIO) at 5.59% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
RIO
Materials industry group
5.59%
- RIO
- 5.59%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
STLD
Materials industry group
0.94%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- STLD
- 0.94%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Steel Dynamics (STLD) at 15.44% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Rio Tinto (RIO) at 54.46% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
RIO
Materials industry group
54.46%
- Max
- 83.62%
- RIO
- 54.46%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
STLD
Materials industry group
15.44%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- STLD
- 15.44%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | RIO | STLD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 5.59% | 0.94% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 54.46% | 15.44% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Rio Tinto (RIO) at 11.35 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Steel Dynamics (STLD) at 16.46 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for RIO, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
RIO
Materials industry group
11.35
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- RIO
- 11.35
- Min
- 3.93
STLD
Materials industry group
16.46
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- STLD
- 16.46
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Rio Tinto (RIO) at 2.20 and Steel Dynamics (STLD) at 1.43 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
RIO
Materials industry group
2.20
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- RIO
- 2.20
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
STLD
Materials industry group
1.43
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- STLD
- 1.43
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Rio Tinto (RIO) at 2.08 and Steel Dynamics (STLD) at 3.23 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
RIO
Materials industry group
2.08
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- RIO
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
STLD
Materials industry group
3.23
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- STLD
- 3.23
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | RIO | STLD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 11.35 | 16.46 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.20 | 1.43 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.08 | 3.23 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.64% | 1.36% |