QSR vs. YUMC: Restaurant Brands vs. Yum China Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Yum China (YUMC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Yum China (YUMC) are both classified in the Restaurants sub-industry within the broader Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Company profile comparison for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Yum China (YUMC)
Profile Item	QSR	YUMC
Name	Restaurant Brands International Inc.	Yum China Holdings, Inc.
Country/Region	United States	China
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry Group	Consumer Services	Consumer Services
GICS Industry	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure
GICS Sub-Industry	Restaurants	Restaurants
Market Capitalization	35.56 billion USD	16.79 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	December 11, 2014	October 17, 2016
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

QSR

YUMC

GSPC

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Yum China (YUMC), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Yum China (YUMC). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Yum China (YUMC). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Yum China (YUMC)
Metric	QSR	YUMC
Total Return (1Y)	19.01%	17.02%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	7.95%	6.80%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	9.80%	-0.60%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

QSR

YUMC

GSPC

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Yum China (YUMC), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Yum China (YUMC). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Yum China (YUMC)
Metric	QSR	YUMC
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	24.79%	25.40%
Beta (5Y)	0.54	0.01
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-24.53%	-53.84%
Avg. Volume (3M)	2.91M	1.59M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

QSR and YUMC are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Yum China (YUMC)
Metric	QSR	YUMC
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.59	0.50
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	0.89	0.77

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 39.05% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Yum China (YUMC) at 17.35% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for QSR.

QSR

Consumer Services industry group

39.05%

Max: 76.75%
QSR: 39.05%
Q3: 34.07%
Median: 15.90%
Q1: 3.23%
Min: -40.61%

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

17.35%

Max: 76.75%
Q3: 34.07%
YUMC: 17.35%
Median: 15.90%
Q1: 3.23%
Min: -40.61%

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their ROE against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 15.35% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Yum China (YUMC) at 7.90%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

QSR

Consumer Services industry group

15.35%

Max: 25.52%
QSR: 15.35%
Q3: 12.95%
Median: 6.63%
Q1: 1.46%
Min: -14.36%

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

7.90%

Max: 25.52%
Q3: 12.95%
YUMC: 7.90%
Median: 6.63%
Q1: 1.46%
Min: -14.36%

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their net margin against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 27.92% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Yum China (YUMC) at 13.09%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

QSR

Consumer Services industry group

27.92%

Max: 49.05%
QSR: 27.92%
Q3: 24.35%
Median: 14.23%
Q1: 5.67%
Min: -16.47%

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

13.09%

Max: 49.05%
Q3: 24.35%
Median: 14.23%
YUMC: 13.09%
Q1: 5.67%
Min: -16.47%

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their operating margin against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Yum China (YUMC)
Metric	QSR	YUMC
ROE (TTM)	39.05%	17.35%
ROA (TTM)	6.48%	7.81%
Net Margin (TTM)	15.35%	7.90%
Operating Margin (TTM)	27.92%	13.09%
Gross Margin (TTM)	34.33%	20.45%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 12.23% and Yum China (YUMC) at 4.37% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Restaurant Brands (QSR) at -26.10% and Yum China (YUMC) at 7.73% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Yum China (YUMC)
Metric	QSR	YUMC
Revenue Growth (YoY)	12.23%	4.37%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	13.19%	7.23%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-26.10%	7.73%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	-10.24%	34.14%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 0.96 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Yum China (YUMC) at 0.67 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for YUMC.

QSR

Consumer Services industry group

0.96

Max: 3.41
Q3: 1.85
Median: 1.06
QSR: 0.96
Q1: 0.72
Min: 0.22

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

0.67

Max: 3.41
Q3: 1.85
Median: 1.06
Q1: 0.72
YUMC: 0.67
Min: 0.22

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their current ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 2.84 and Yum China (YUMC) at 0.54 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

QSR

Consumer Services industry group

2.84

Max: 6.12
Q3: 2.93
QSR: 2.84
Median: 1.29
Q1: 0.37
Min: 0.01

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

0.54

Max: 6.12
Q3: 2.93
Median: 1.29
YUMC: 0.54
Q1: 0.37
Min: 0.01

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Yum China (YUMC)
Metric	QSR	YUMC
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.96	0.67
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	2.84	0.54
Net Debt / EBITDA	4.98	0.85

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 3.27% and Yum China (YUMC) at 2.23% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.

QSR

Consumer Services industry group

3.27%

Max: 4.10%
QSR: 3.27%
Q3: 1.82%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

2.23%

Max: 4.10%
YUMC: 2.23%
Q3: 1.82%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 56.48% and Yum China (YUMC) at 38.54% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.

QSR

Consumer Services industry group

56.48%

Max: 89.80%
QSR: 56.48%
Q3: 36.83%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

38.54%

Max: 89.80%
YUMC: 38.54%
Q3: 36.83%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Yum China (YUMC)
Metric	QSR	YUMC
Dividend Yield (TTM)	3.27%	2.23%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	56.48%	38.54%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 17.07 and Yum China (YUMC) at 17.34 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

QSR

Consumer Services industry group

17.07

Max: 71.70
Q3: 37.12
Median: 21.88
QSR: 17.07
Q1: 13.00
Min: 5.72

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

17.34

Max: 71.70
Q3: 37.12
Median: 21.88
YUMC: 17.34
Q1: 13.00
Min: 5.72

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Yum China (YUMC) at 1.32 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 3.64 sits in the pricier quartile — QSR costs more per dollar of sales.

QSR

Consumer Services industry group

3.64

Max: 6.40
QSR: 3.64
Q3: 3.01
Median: 1.54
Q1: 0.74
Min: 0.08

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

1.32

Max: 6.40
Q3: 3.01
Median: 1.54
YUMC: 1.32
Q1: 0.74
Min: 0.08

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Yum China (YUMC) at 3.19 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 6.87 carries an above-peer premium to book — QSR is pricier on assets.

QSR

Consumer Services industry group

6.87

Max: 12.02
QSR: 6.87
Q3: 5.58
Median: 2.37
Q1: 1.09
Min: -4.51

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

3.19

Max: 12.02
Q3: 5.58
YUMC: 3.19
Median: 2.37
Q1: 1.09
Min: -4.51

Restaurant Brands (QSR) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Restaurant Brands (QSR) and Yum China (YUMC)
Metric	QSR	YUMC
P/E Ratio (TTM)	17.07	17.34
P/S Ratio (TTM)	3.64	1.32
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	6.87	3.19
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	4.48%	-2.30%