PUK vs. WTW: Prudential vs. Willis Towers Watson Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Prudential (PUK) and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) both belong to the Insurance industry, though PUK is classified under Life & Health Insurance while WTW falls under Insurance Brokers.

Willis Towers Watson (WTW) trades as ordinary local shares, while Prudential (PUK) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Prudential (PUK) at 18.74% and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 20.18% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Prudential (PUK) at 25.49% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 15.22%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Prudential (PUK) in Insurance and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) in Insurance, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Prudential (PUK) at 68.98% delivers above-range revenue growth, while Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at -2.24% falls into the bottom quartile — a wide split in revenue momentum.

Only one side can be read here: Prudential (PUK) reports EPS growth of 82.74%, ranked against its industry; Willis Towers Watson (WTW) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Prudential (PUK) in Insurance and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) in Insurance both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Prudential (PUK) in Insurance and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) in Insurance run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Prudential (PUK) at 1.10% and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 0.29% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

Both Prudential (PUK) at 18.71% and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 23.34% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Prudential (PUK) at 8.72 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 20.20 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

Prudential (PUK) at 2.12 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 2.95 sits in the pricier quartile — WTW costs more per dollar of sales.

Both look rich against book: Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 3.91 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Prudential (PUK) at 6.29 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Valuation Metrics