PUK vs. RYAN: Prudential vs. Ryan Specialty Stock Comparison
How do Prudential (PUK) and Ryan Specialty (RYAN) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Prudential (PUK) and Ryan Specialty (RYAN) both belong to the Insurance industry, though PUK is classified under Life & Health Insurance while RYAN falls under Insurance Brokers.
Prudential (PUK) has more than two decades of public-market history since June 29, 2000, whereas Ryan Specialty (RYAN) listed on July 22, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.
Ryan Specialty (RYAN) trades as ordinary local shares, while Prudential (PUK) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | PUK | RYAN |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Prudential plc ADR | Ryan Specialty Holdings Inc. |
| Country/Region | Hong Kong | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Insurance | Insurance |
| GICS Industry | Insurance | Insurance |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Life & Health Insurance | Insurance Brokers |
| Market Capitalization | 30.28 billion USD | 12.10 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 29, 2000 | July 22, 2021 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | PUK | RYAN |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -7.39% | -17.50% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 8.09% | 2.91% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -6.78% | 5.30% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | PUK | RYAN |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 29.81% | 43.93% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.64 | 0.52 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -62.24% | -60.94% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.21M | 1.89M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | PUK | RYAN |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.39 | -0.50 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.54 | -0.67 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Ryan Specialty (RYAN) at 25.15% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Prudential (PUK) at 18.74% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for RYAN.
PUK
Insurance industry group
18.74%
- Max
- 41.68%
- Q3
- 22.04%
- PUK
- 18.74%
- Median
- 14.81%
- Q1
- 8.79%
- Min
- -10.66%
RYAN
Insurance industry group
25.15%
- Max
- 41.68%
- RYAN
- 25.15%
- Q3
- 22.04%
- Median
- 14.81%
- Q1
- 8.79%
- Min
- -10.66%
Net Margin (TTM)
Prudential (PUK) at 25.49% keeps a top-quartile share of each sales dollar as profit, while Ryan Specialty (RYAN) at 3.27% keeps a bottom-quartile share.
PUK
Insurance industry group
25.49%
- Max
- 29.92%
- PUK
- 25.49%
- Q3
- 17.03%
- Median
- 10.97%
- Q1
- 6.21%
- Min
- -4.68%
RYAN
Insurance industry group
3.27%
- Max
- 29.92%
- Q3
- 17.03%
- Median
- 10.97%
- Q1
- 6.21%
- RYAN
- 3.27%
- Min
- -4.68%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Prudential (PUK) in Insurance and Ryan Specialty (RYAN) in Insurance, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | PUK | RYAN |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 18.74% | 25.15% |
| ROA (TTM) | 1.60% | 3.79% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 25.49% | 3.27% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Prudential (PUK) at 68.98% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Ryan Specialty (RYAN) at 21.28%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
EPS Growth
Prudential (PUK) at 82.74% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Ryan Specialty (RYAN) at -33.80% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | PUK | RYAN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 68.98% | 21.28% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 20.93% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 82.74% | -33.80% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 61.41% | -3.31% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Prudential (PUK) in Insurance and Ryan Specialty (RYAN) in Insurance both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Prudential (PUK) in Insurance and Ryan Specialty (RYAN) in Insurance run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | PUK | RYAN |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Prudential (PUK) at 1.10% and Ryan Specialty (RYAN) at 1.06% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
PUK
Insurance industry group
1.10%
- Max
- 5.12%
- Q3
- 2.15%
- PUK
- 1.10%
- Median
- 0.98%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RYAN
Insurance industry group
1.06%
- Max
- 5.12%
- Q3
- 2.15%
- RYAN
- 1.06%
- Median
- 0.98%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Prudential (PUK) at 18.71% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Ryan Specialty (RYAN) at 63.75% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
PUK
Insurance industry group
18.71%
- Max
- 76.67%
- Q3
- 35.18%
- PUK
- 18.71%
- Median
- 14.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RYAN
Insurance industry group
63.75%
- Max
- 76.67%
- RYAN
- 63.75%
- Q3
- 35.18%
- Median
- 14.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | PUK | RYAN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.10% | 1.06% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 18.71% | 63.75% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Prudential (PUK) at 8.72 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Ryan Specialty (RYAN) at 59.66 trades above its peer range — a wide earnings-valuation gap relative to industry peers.
PUK
Insurance industry group
8.72
- Max
- 28.37
- Q3
- 18.75
- Median
- 12.23
- Q1
- 9.08
- PUK
- 8.72
- Min
- 2.32
RYAN
Insurance industry group
59.66
- RYAN
- 59.66
- Max
- 28.37
- Q3
- 18.75
- Median
- 12.23
- Q1
- 9.08
- Min
- 2.32
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Prudential (PUK) at 2.12 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ryan Specialty (RYAN) at 3.78 sits in the pricier quartile — RYAN costs more per dollar of sales.
PUK
Insurance industry group
2.12
- Max
- 4.03
- Q3
- 2.25
- PUK
- 2.12
- Median
- 1.23
- Q1
- 0.85
- Min
- 0.07
RYAN
Insurance industry group
3.78
- Max
- 4.03
- RYAN
- 3.78
- Q3
- 2.25
- Median
- 1.23
- Q1
- 0.85
- Min
- 0.07
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Measured against book value, both Prudential (PUK) at 6.29 and Ryan Specialty (RYAN) at 12.86 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.
PUK
Insurance industry group
6.29
- PUK
- 6.29
- Max
- 5.07
- Q3
- 2.79
- Median
- 1.76
- Q1
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.30
RYAN
Insurance industry group
12.86
- RYAN
- 12.86
- Max
- 5.07
- Q3
- 2.79
- Median
- 1.76
- Q1
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.30
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | PUK | RYAN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 8.72 | 59.66 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.12 | 3.78 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.29 | 12.86 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |