PSX vs. VNOM: Phillips 66 vs. Viper Energy Stock Comparison
How do Phillips 66 (PSX) and Viper Energy (VNOM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Phillips 66 (PSX) and Viper Energy (VNOM) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though PSX is classified under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing while VNOM falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.
| Profile Item | PSX | VNOM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Phillips 66 | Viper Energy, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 95.85 billion USD | 21.21 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | April 12, 2012 | June 18, 2014 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | PSX | VNOM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 88.91% | 12.89% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 36.18% | 17.78% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 30.83% | 18.74% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | PSX | VNOM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 33.42% | 29.71% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.72 | 0.54 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -44.37% | -34.46% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.92M | 1.93M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | PSX | VNOM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 2.53 | 0.29 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 3.93 | 0.40 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Phillips 66 (PSX) at 39.84% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Viper Energy (VNOM) at 5.60% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PSX.
PSX
Energy industry group
39.84%
- Max
- 53.85%
- PSX
- 39.84%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
VNOM
Energy industry group
5.60%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- VNOM
- 5.60%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.48% and Viper Energy (VNOM) at 12.77% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
PSX
Energy industry group
7.48%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- PSX
- 7.48%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
VNOM
Energy industry group
12.77%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- VNOM
- 12.77%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Viper Energy (VNOM) at 58.79% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Phillips 66 (PSX) at 13.17%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
PSX
Energy industry group
13.17%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- PSX
- 13.17%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
VNOM
Energy industry group
58.79%
- Max
- 71.31%
- VNOM
- 58.79%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | PSX | VNOM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 39.84% | 5.60% |
| ROA (TTM) | 10.64% | 5.83% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 7.48% | 12.77% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 13.17% | 58.79% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 15.08% | 100.00% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Viper Energy (VNOM) at 62.09% delivers above-range revenue growth, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at -7.53% falls into the bottom quartile — a wide split in revenue momentum.
EPS Growth
Phillips 66 (PSX) at 116.23% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Viper Energy (VNOM) at -112.57% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | PSX | VNOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -7.53% | 62.09% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -8.00% | 17.21% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 116.23% | -112.57% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -22.60% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Phillips 66 (PSX) at 1.34 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Viper Energy (VNOM) at 5.92 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
PSX
Energy industry group
1.34
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- PSX
- 1.34
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
VNOM
Energy industry group
5.92
- VNOM
- 5.92
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Viper Energy (VNOM) at 0.23 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.52 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
PSX
Energy industry group
0.52
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- PSX
- 0.52
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
VNOM
Energy industry group
0.23
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- VNOM
- 0.23
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | PSX | VNOM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.34 | 5.92 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.52 | 0.23 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.82 | 1.14 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Viper Energy (VNOM) at 5.97% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.03% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, VNOM the richer one.
PSX
Energy industry group
2.03%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- PSX
- 2.03%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VNOM
Energy industry group
5.97%
- Max
- 8.57%
- VNOM
- 5.97%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Viper Energy (VNOM) reports payout ratio above 100% at 194.44%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Phillips 66 (PSX) reports 16.07%, ranking against industry peers normally.
PSX
Energy industry group
16.07%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- PSX
- 16.07%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VNOM
Energy industry group
194.44%
- VNOM
- 194.44%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | PSX | VNOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.03% | 5.97% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 16.07% | 194.44% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.88 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Viper Energy (VNOM) at 32.24 sits in the richer quartile — VNOM needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
PSX
Energy industry group
7.88
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- PSX
- 7.88
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
VNOM
Energy industry group
32.24
- Max
- 39.54
- VNOM
- 32.24
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.57 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Viper Energy (VNOM) at 9.82 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.
PSX
Energy industry group
0.57
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- PSX
- 0.57
- Min
- 0.00
VNOM
Energy industry group
9.82
- VNOM
- 9.82
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Viper Energy (VNOM) at 1.53 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.79 carries an above-peer premium to book — PSX is pricier on assets.
PSX
Energy industry group
2.79
- Max
- 4.21
- PSX
- 2.79
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
VNOM
Energy industry group
1.53
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- VNOM
- 1.53
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | PSX | VNOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 7.88 | 32.24 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.57 | 9.82 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.79 | 1.53 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 9.93% | 3.67% |