Seek Returns

PBA vs. PSX: Pembina Pipeline vs. Phillips 66 Stock Comparison

How do Pembina Pipeline (PBA) and Phillips 66 (PSX) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Pembina Pipeline (PBA) and Phillips 66 (PSX) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though PBA is classified under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation while PSX falls under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing.

Company profile comparison for Pembina Pipeline (PBA) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
Profile ItemPBAPSX
NamePembina Pipeline Corp.Phillips 66
Country/RegionCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Storage & TransportationOil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Market Capitalization28.08 billion USD95.85 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 6, 2010April 12, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

PBA
PSX
GSPC
Loading price history…
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Pembina Pipeline (PBA) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Pembina Pipeline (PBA) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Pembina Pipeline (PBA) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricPBAPSX
Total Return (1Y)35.84%88.91%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)20.26%36.18%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)12.46%30.83%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

PBA
PSX
GSPC
Loading price history…
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Pembina Pipeline (PBA) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Pembina Pipeline (PBA) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricPBAPSX
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)20.43%33.42%
Beta (5Y)0.590.72
Max Drawdown (5Y)-27.37%-44.37%
Avg. Volume (3M)993.87K2.92M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
PBA and PSX are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Pembina Pipeline (PBA) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricPBAPSX
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.542.53
Sortino Ratio (1Y)2.323.93

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 39.84% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 12.10% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PSX.

PBA

Energy industry group

12.10%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
PBA
12.10%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

PSX

Energy industry group

39.84%

Max
53.85%
PSX
39.84%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 24.78% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.48%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

PBA

Energy industry group

24.78%

Max
56.92%
PBA
24.78%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

PSX

Energy industry group

7.48%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
PSX
7.48%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 32.63% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 13.17% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

PBA

Energy industry group

32.63%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
PBA
32.63%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

PSX

Energy industry group

13.17%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
PSX
13.17%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Pembina Pipeline (PBA) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricPBAPSX
ROE (TTM)12.10%39.84%
ROA (TTM)4.65%10.64%
Net Margin (TTM)24.78%7.48%
Operating Margin (TTM)32.63%13.17%
Gross Margin (TTM)38.23%15.08%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 5.34% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at -7.53% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 116.23% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at -11.33% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for PSX.

Loading chart…
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Pembina Pipeline (PBA) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricPBAPSX
Revenue Growth (YoY)5.34%-7.53%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-12.50%-8.00%
EPS Growth (YoY)-11.33%116.23%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-19.61%-22.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 1.34 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 0.75 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PBA.

PBA

Energy industry group

0.75

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
PBA
0.75
Min
0.24

PSX

Energy industry group

1.34

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
PSX
1.34
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 0.80 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.52 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

PBA

Energy industry group

0.80

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
PBA
0.80
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

PSX

Energy industry group

0.52

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
PSX
0.52
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Pembina Pipeline (PBA) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricPBAPSX
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.751.34
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.800.52
Net Debt / EBITDA3.740.82

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 6.13% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.03% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, PBA the richer one.

PBA

Energy industry group

6.13%

Max
8.57%
PBA
6.13%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PSX

Energy industry group

2.03%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
PSX
2.03%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 16.07% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 86.79% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

PBA

Energy industry group

86.79%

Max
133.24%
PBA
86.79%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PSX

Energy industry group

16.07%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
PSX
16.07%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Pembina Pipeline (PBA) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricPBAPSX
Dividend Yield (TTM)6.13%2.03%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)86.79%16.07%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 20.12 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.88 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

PBA

Energy industry group

20.12

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
PBA
20.12
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

PSX

Energy industry group

7.88

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
PSX
7.88
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.57 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 3.36 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

PBA

Energy industry group

3.36

Max
5.40
PBA
3.36
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

PSX

Energy industry group

0.57

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
PSX
0.57
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 2.55 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.79 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

PBA

Energy industry group

2.55

Max
4.21
PBA
2.55
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

PSX

Energy industry group

2.79

Max
4.21
PSX
2.79
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Pembina Pipeline (PBA) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricPBAPSX
P/E Ratio (TTM)20.127.88
P/S Ratio (TTM)3.360.57
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.552.79
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)5.53%9.93%