NTRS vs. OWL: Northern Trust vs. Blue Owl Capital Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Northern Trust (NTRS) and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) are both classified in the Asset Management & Custody Banks sub-industry within the broader Capital Markets industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Northern Trust (NTRS) has more than two decades of public-market history since March 17, 1980, whereas Blue Owl Capital (OWL) listed on December 14, 2020 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Northern Trust (NTRS) at 18.44% and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 6.41% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Northern Trust (NTRS) at 26.00% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 3.08% retains only a bottom-quartile share.

Both Northern Trust (NTRS) at 34.80% and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 31.15% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 25.04% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Northern Trust (NTRS) at -2.46% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Northern Trust (NTRS) at -10.54% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at -50.00% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Northern Trust (NTRS) in Financial Services and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Northern Trust (NTRS) in Financial Services and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 9.66% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Northern Trust (NTRS) at 1.91% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, OWL the richer one.

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) reports payout ratio above 100% at 650.00%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Northern Trust (NTRS) reports 25.73%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Northern Trust (NTRS) at 13.55 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 70.14 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for OWL’s trailing earnings.

Northern Trust (NTRS) at 3.35 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 5.04 sits in the pricier quartile — OWL costs more per dollar of sales.

On P/B ratio, both Northern Trust (NTRS) at 2.51 and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 3.54 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics