NMR vs. TOST: Nomura vs. Toast Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Nomura (NMR) and Toast (TOST) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but NMR is classified in Capital Markets while TOST is classified in Financial Services.

Nomura (NMR) has more than two decades of public-market history since December 17, 2001, whereas Toast (TOST) listed on September 22, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Toast (TOST) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Toast (TOST) at 25.58% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Nomura (NMR) at 11.51% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for TOST.

Both Nomura (NMR) at 17.12% and Toast (TOST) at 7.69% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Nomura (NMR) at 24.36% runs core operations around its industry’s norm, while Toast (TOST) at 8.63% operates in the bottom quartile.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% and Toast (TOST) at 24.05% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Toast (TOST) at 1,766.67% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Nomura (NMR) at 7.17%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services and Toast (TOST) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services and Toast (TOST) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Toast (TOST) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Nomura (NMR) reports a yield of 620.40%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Toast (TOST) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Nomura (NMR) reports a payout of 16.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Toast (TOST) at 38.10 sits in the richer quartile — TOST needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Toast (TOST) at 2.82 prices around its industry’s middle — NMR costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Toast (TOST) at 8.79 prices above its benchmark range — TOST looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics