MAIR vs. PH: Madison Air vs. Parker-Hannifin Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Madison Air (MAIR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Madison Air (MAIR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but MAIR is classified in Building Products while PH is classified in Machinery.

Parker-Hannifin (PH) has been public since March 17, 1980, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Madison Air (MAIR) listed only on April 16, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Company profile comparison for Madison Air (MAIR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Profile Item	MAIR	PH
Name	Madison Air Solutions Corporation Class A Common Stock	Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Capital Goods	Capital Goods
GICS Industry	Building Products	Machinery
GICS Sub-Industry	Building Products	Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components
Market Capitalization	11.56 billion USD	115.73 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	April 16, 2026	March 17, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

MAIR

GSPC

Madison Air (MAIR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Madison Air (MAIR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Madison Air (MAIR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Madison Air (MAIR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	MAIR	PH
Total Return (1Y)	--	14.13%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	--	33.71%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	--	25.35%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

MAIR

GSPC

Madison Air (MAIR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Madison Air (MAIR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Madison Air (MAIR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	MAIR	PH
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	57.10%	27.33%
Beta (5Y)	1.60	1.12
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-51.16%	-28.64%
Avg. Volume (3M)	2.60M	627.57K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both MAIR and PH need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Madison Air (MAIR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	MAIR	PH
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	--	0.36
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	--	0.53

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Parker-Hannifin (PH) earns 24.95% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Madison Air (MAIR) has no ROE this period.

MAIR

Capital Goods industry group

Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%
MAIR: --

PH

Capital Goods industry group

24.95%

Max: 40.55%
PH: 24.95%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

Madison Air (MAIR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): MAIR does not report ROE, so it has no value marker; PH is benchmarked against the Capital Goods industry group.

Net Margin (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 16.62% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Madison Air (MAIR) at 3.73%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

MAIR

Capital Goods industry group

3.73%

Max: 27.47%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
MAIR: 3.73%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

16.62%

Max: 27.47%
PH: 16.62%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

Madison Air (MAIR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Madison Air (MAIR) at 19.76% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 21.90% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

MAIR

Capital Goods industry group

19.76%

Max: 36.60%
MAIR: 19.76%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

21.90%

Max: 36.60%
PH: 21.90%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

Madison Air (MAIR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Madison Air (MAIR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	MAIR	PH
ROE (TTM)	--	24.95%
ROA (TTM)	--	8.56%
Net Margin (TTM)	3.73%	16.62%
Operating Margin (TTM)	19.76%	21.90%
Gross Margin (TTM)	39.06%	37.70%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Madison Air (MAIR) at 34.07% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 8.31% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for MAIR.

Madison Air (MAIR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Madison Air (MAIR) at -2.32% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.01% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Madison Air (MAIR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Madison Air (MAIR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	MAIR	PH
Revenue Growth (YoY)	34.07%	8.31%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	--	4.09%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-2.32%	5.01%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	--	21.09%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Madison Air (MAIR) at 1.82 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.94 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PH.

MAIR

Capital Goods industry group

1.82

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
MAIR: 1.82
Q1: 1.43
Min: 0.36

PH

Capital Goods industry group

0.94

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
PH: 0.94
Min: 0.36

Madison Air (MAIR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Madison Air (MAIR) at 0.87 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 1.09 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

MAIR

Capital Goods industry group

0.87

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
MAIR: 0.87
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

PH

Capital Goods industry group

1.09

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
PH: 1.09
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

Madison Air (MAIR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Madison Air (MAIR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	MAIR	PH
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.82	0.94
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	0.87	1.09
Net Debt / EBITDA	3.37	2.81

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Madison Air (MAIR) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Parker-Hannifin (PH) reports a yield of 0.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.

MAIR

Capital Goods industry group

0.00%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
Median: 0.24%
MAIR: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

0.85%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
PH: 0.85%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Madison Air (MAIR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Madison Air (MAIR) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Parker-Hannifin (PH) reports a payout of 26.11%, ranking against industry peers normally.

MAIR

Capital Goods industry group

0.00%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
Median: 6.86%
MAIR: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

26.11%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
PH: 26.11%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Madison Air (MAIR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Madison Air (MAIR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	MAIR	PH
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.85%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	26.11%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 31.53 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Madison Air (MAIR) at 164.57 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for MAIR’s trailing earnings.

MAIR

Capital Goods industry group

164.57

MAIR: 164.57
Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

PH

Capital Goods industry group

31.53

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
PH: 31.53
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

Madison Air (MAIR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Madison Air (MAIR) at 3.09 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.16 sits in the pricier quartile — PH costs more per dollar of sales.

MAIR

Capital Goods industry group

3.09

Max: 7.54
Q3: 3.76
MAIR: 3.09
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

PH

Capital Goods industry group

5.16

Max: 7.54
PH: 5.16
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

Madison Air (MAIR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Madison Air (MAIR) at 3.17 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 7.25 carries an above-peer premium to book — PH is pricier on assets.

MAIR

Capital Goods industry group

3.17

Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
MAIR: 3.17
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

PH

Capital Goods industry group

7.25

Max: 9.66
PH: 7.25
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

Madison Air (MAIR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Madison Air (MAIR) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	MAIR	PH
P/E Ratio (TTM)	164.57	31.53
P/S Ratio (TTM)	3.09	5.16
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	3.17	7.25
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	--	2.45%