Seek Returns logo

LYV vs. RDDT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LYV and RDDT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLYVRDDT
Company NameLive Nation Entertainment, Inc.Reddit, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesCommunication Services
GICS IndustryEntertainmentInteractive Media & Services
Market Capitalization38.47 billion USD41.12 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 21, 2005March 21, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LYV and RDDT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LYV vs. RDDT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLYVRDDT
5-Day Price Return1.80%-3.70%
13-Week Price Return14.82%123.48%
26-Week Price Return7.92%15.85%
52-Week Price Return72.82%289.39%
Month-to-Date Return12.28%36.83%
Year-to-Date Return28.06%34.44%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.06M7.11M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.45M8.13M
3-Month Volatility24.29%61.04%
Beta1.422.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LYV

396.60%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

LYV’s Return on Equity of 396.60% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

RDDT

9.93%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.37%
Q3
29.69%
Median
9.73%
Q1
2.47%
Min
-26.19%

RDDT’s Return on Equity of 9.93% is on par with the norm for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LYV vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LYV

3.88%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, LYV’s Net Profit Margin of 3.88% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

RDDT

12.97%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
50.41%
Q3
29.38%
Median
17.14%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-30.88%

RDDT’s Net Profit Margin of 12.97% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LYV vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LYV

4.21%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

LYV’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.21% is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

RDDT

7.87%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
65.96%
Q3
36.95%
Median
18.60%
Q1
5.69%
Min
-18.13%

RDDT’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.87% is around the midpoint for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LYV vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLYVRDDT
Return on Equity (TTM)396.60%9.93%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.36%9.04%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.88%12.97%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.21%7.87%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)25.24%91.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LYV

0.88

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

LYV’s Current Ratio of 0.88 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RDDT

12.00

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
4.30
Q3
2.68
Median
1.96
Q1
1.21
Min
0.45

RDDT’s Current Ratio of 12.00 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

LYV vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LYV

17.99

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 17.99, LYV operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Entertainment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

RDDT

0.00

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
0.90
Q3
0.47
Median
0.16
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, RDDT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LYV vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LYV

4.97

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

LYV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RDDT

--

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
67.60
Q3
29.41
Median
6.36
Q1
-0.87
Min
-37.02

Interest Coverage Ratio data for RDDT is currently unavailable.

LYV vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLYVRDDT
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.8812.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.7411.89
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)17.990.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.97--

Growth

Revenue Growth

LYV vs. RDDT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LYV vs. RDDT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LYV

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LYV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RDDT

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
1.87%
Q3
1.08%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RDDT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LYV vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LYV

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LYV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RDDT

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
87.35%
Q3
38.67%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RDDT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LYV vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLYVRDDT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LYV

41.09

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

LYV’s P/E Ratio of 41.09 is within the middle range for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RDDT

188.91

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
87.79
Q3
54.33
Median
25.46
Q1
18.76
Min
6.96

At 188.91, RDDT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LYV vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LYV

1.59

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, LYV’s P/S Ratio of 1.59 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

RDDT

24.50

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
19.01
Q3
12.39
Median
6.49
Q1
1.94
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 24.50, RDDT trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Interactive Media & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LYV vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LYV

97.21

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

At 97.21, LYV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Entertainment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RDDT

11.64

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
11.66
Q3
7.17
Median
4.17
Q1
2.80
Min
0.12

RDDT’s P/B Ratio of 11.64 is in the upper tier for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LYV vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLYVRDDT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)41.09188.91
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.5924.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)97.2111.64
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.88102.98