Seek Returns logo

GOOGL vs. LYV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GOOGL and LYV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGOOGLLYV
Company NameAlphabet Inc.Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesCommunication Services
GICS IndustryInteractive Media & ServicesEntertainment
Market Capitalization2,513.23 billion USD38.40 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateAugust 19, 2004December 21, 2005
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GOOGL and LYV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GOOGL vs. LYV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGOOGLLYV
5-Day Price Return3.87%1.91%
13-Week Price Return20.00%15.77%
26-Week Price Return15.48%10.82%
52-Week Price Return24.87%72.22%
Month-to-Date Return8.12%12.10%
Year-to-Date Return9.60%27.85%
10-Day Avg. Volume27.58M1.96M
3-Month Avg. Volume38.59M2.43M
3-Month Volatility22.40%24.36%
Beta1.001.43

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GOOGL

34.31%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.37%
Q3
29.69%
Median
9.73%
Q1
2.47%
Min
-26.19%

In the upper quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, GOOGL’s Return on Equity of 34.31% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LYV

396.60%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

LYV’s Return on Equity of 396.60% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GOOGL vs. LYV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GOOGL

31.12%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
50.41%
Q3
29.38%
Median
17.14%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-30.88%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.12% places GOOGL in the upper quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LYV

3.88%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, LYV’s Net Profit Margin of 3.88% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

GOOGL vs. LYV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GOOGL

32.68%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
65.96%
Q3
36.95%
Median
18.60%
Q1
5.69%
Min
-18.13%

GOOGL’s Operating Profit Margin of 32.68% is around the midpoint for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LYV

4.21%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

LYV’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.21% is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

GOOGL vs. LYV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGOOGLLYV
Return on Equity (TTM)34.31%396.60%
Return on Assets (TTM)24.88%4.36%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)31.12%3.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.68%4.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)58.94%25.24%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GOOGL

1.90

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
4.30
Q3
2.68
Median
1.96
Q1
1.21
Min
0.45

GOOGL’s Current Ratio of 1.90 aligns with the median group of the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LYV

0.88

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

LYV’s Current Ratio of 0.88 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GOOGL vs. LYV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GOOGL

0.07

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
0.90
Q3
0.47
Median
0.16
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

GOOGL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.07 is typical for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LYV

17.99

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 17.99, LYV operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Entertainment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GOOGL vs. LYV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GOOGL

16.20

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
67.60
Q3
29.41
Median
6.36
Q1
-0.87
Min
-37.02

GOOGL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LYV

4.97

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

LYV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GOOGL vs. LYV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGOOGLLYV
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.900.88
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.900.74
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.0717.99
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)16.204.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

GOOGL vs. LYV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GOOGL vs. LYV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GOOGL

0.41%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
1.87%
Q3
1.08%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GOOGL’s Dividend Yield of 0.41% is consistent with its peers in the Interactive Media & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LYV

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LYV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GOOGL vs. LYV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GOOGL

8.54%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
87.35%
Q3
38.67%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GOOGL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 8.54% is within the typical range for the Interactive Media & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LYV

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LYV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GOOGL vs. LYV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGOOGLLYV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.41%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)8.54%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GOOGL

21.01

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
87.79
Q3
54.33
Median
25.46
Q1
18.76
Min
6.96

GOOGL’s P/E Ratio of 21.01 is within the middle range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LYV

41.09

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

LYV’s P/E Ratio of 41.09 is within the middle range for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GOOGL vs. LYV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GOOGL

6.54

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
19.01
Q3
12.39
Median
6.49
Q1
1.94
Min
0.22

GOOGL’s P/S Ratio of 6.54 aligns with the market consensus for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LYV

1.59

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, LYV’s P/S Ratio of 1.59 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

GOOGL vs. LYV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GOOGL

5.91

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
11.66
Q3
7.17
Median
4.17
Q1
2.80
Min
0.12

GOOGL’s P/B Ratio of 5.91 is within the conventional range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LYV

97.21

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

At 97.21, LYV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Entertainment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GOOGL vs. LYV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGOOGLLYV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.0141.09
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.541.59
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.9197.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)36.3916.88